Re: Eleanor Fitzalan and Thomas Browne
- From: "Chris Phillips" <cgp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 09:47:51 +0100
Will Johnson wrote:
<<of
Probably not, see
<_http://www.medievalgenealogy.org.uk/cp/arundel.shtml_
(http://www.medievalgenealogy.org.uk/cp/arundel.shtml) >
Adrian >>
I'm confused by this reference to a new placement for Mary FitzAlan, wife
John, 4th Lord Strange of Blackmere10th
First it states that " Mary was a daughter of Edmund, the 9th earl, not
Richard, the 10th (see further details below). "
This would place Mary as a sister to Richard the 10th Earl
But then immediately below this it states that "Edmund, SON of Richard,
earl of Arundel, had at least three daughters" [my emphasis] and thengives
them and ADDS this Mary in that location.match the
I think this last part is a mistake. Mary should not be a daughter of
Edmund, son of Richard, but rather, an aunt to this Edmund, which would
first statement and the remaining argument.
Sorry if the layout on that page is confusing. The first part, stating that
Mary was a daughter of Edmund, 9th earl, and that Edmund son of Richard had
at least three daughters, is meant to be a short summary of the corrections
to the quoted passage in CP, and then further details are given under
subheadings for these two points. So the three known daughters of Edmund son
of Richard are just Elizabeth, Philippa and Katherine - there's not meant to
be an implication that Mary was a fourth daughter.
Chris Phillips
.
- References:
- Re: Eleanor Fitzalan and Thomas Browne
- From: WJhonson
- Re: Eleanor Fitzalan and Thomas Browne
- Prev by Date: Re: Re: Wills of Kent and Croil wills
- Next by Date: C.P. Correction: Beatrice de Valle, wife of William Briwerre, formerly mistress of Reynold Fitz Roy, Earl of Cornwall
- Previous by thread: Re: Eleanor Fitzalan and Thomas Browne
- Next by thread: Re: Eleanor Fitzalan and Thomas Browne
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|