Re: John Baynton/wife dudley

In message of 18 Jan, charcsmith@xxxxxxxxxxx (charlotte smith) wrote:

> John Brandon gave the information that he found in Stirnet.re
> Baynton. Did you notice that he also has Nicholas Baynton just above
> John as also married to same Joan D?. I have found Stirnet to have
> problems on several lines.

In fairness to them, they don't set out to provide high levels of
accuracy. See http://www.stirnet.com/HTML/genie/gensourc.htm
where they say:

"Don't forget that we have placed a signficant <a
href="genfam.htm#cave" target="_self">caveat</a> at the top of the Lead
Index that provides entry into the database. We KNOW that some of the
sources we have used are not fully reliable. From this we accept that
some of the data in our database are likely to be wrong. However, if we
were not to include a datum unless it had been professionally verified
we would never be able to develop this type of database - nor would
anyone else."

--
Tim Powys-Lybbe                                          tim@xxxxxxxxx
             For a miscellany of bygones: http://powys.org
.