Re: Hubert de Burgh's alleged Pouchard ancestry
- From: WJhonson@xxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 06:45:49 +0000 (UTC)
In a message dated 1/6/2006 6:22:00 AM Pacific Standard Time,
royalancestry@xxxxxxx writes:
The daughter, Alice, in turn
had three daughters, among them Joan, wife of Reyner de Burgh, who was
living in 35 Henry III [1250-1251].
Are you saying here that Reyner de Burgh was living in 35 Henry III ?
If so, then I find it remarkable that a historian or antiquarian would
attempt to say that Reyner was the father of a man who was surely long dead
already, and after a long career.
How Reyner could be thrust backward two centuries without serious harm is
beyond me.
Perhaps Reyner and Joan really are the parents of *some* Hubert, just not
*the* Hubert?
Otherwise I cannot see how anyone could make such an outrageous mistake.
Perhaps there is more than one Alice Pouchard? The whole thing has now
achieved a new high-water mark for confusion.
Will Johnson
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hubert de Burgh's alleged Pouchard ancestry
- From: Chris Phillips
- Re: Hubert de Burgh's alleged Pouchard ancestry
- From: Todd A. Farmerie
- Re: Hubert de Burgh's alleged Pouchard ancestry
- Prev by Date: Re: Hubert de Burgh's alleged Pouchard ancestry
- Next by Date: Where's Munchensy?
- Previous by thread: Re: Hubert de Burgh's alleged Pouchard ancestry
- Next by thread: Re: Hubert de Burgh's alleged Pouchard ancestry
- Index(es):