Re: C.P. Addition: Parentage of Hubert de Burgh, Earl of Kent


Douglas Richardson wrote:
> You're dodging the question, CED.
>
> Do you read Latin?
>
> A simple yes or no will suffice.

To the Newsgroup:

Whether I read Latin is not the question. Richardson is raising a new
issue to hide the original question - his old habit for dodgery.
However, if history is a guide on Richardson's secondary and irrelevant
question, my Latin is as good as his.

CED
>
> Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah
>
> Website: www.royalancestry.net
>
>
> CED wrote:
> > Douglas Richardson wrote:
> > > Dear CED ~
> > >
> > > I've supplied you the correct URL for the Dugdale text. What's the
> > > problem now? Do you not read Latin?
> >
> > To the Newsgroup:
> >
> > It is not the Latin (we all know Richardson's history with languages);
> > it is the document. Who wrote the foundation history and when was that
> > history written. It is not a primary source, by defintion. If
> > Richardson uses it as evidence, he must establish its reliability. Its
> > status as evidence to support Richardson's original contention is the
> > question. Richardson has an old habit of twisting the question and
> > shifting the burden of proof. He is using it again.
> >
> > CED
> >
> > >
> > > Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah
> > >
> > > Website: www.royalancestry.net

.

Relevant Pages