Not speaking on my behalf (was:Re: William de Lancaster I's uncle, Ketel Fitz Eldred

This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

---559023410-1804928587-1133815568=:9116
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE

On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Tim Powys-Lybbe wrote:

> In message of 5 Dec, volucris@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> Dear Douglas,
>>
>> You are not speaking on my behalf. This word game you're playing looks
>> much like the wordgames you were playing with Peter Stewart. A fox
>> might loose his hairs but won't loose his tricks. I might as well be
>> absent again. Nothing changes much.
>
> Seconded.
>
>>
>> Hans Vogels

Nor for me. Dolly Ziegler

>>
>>
>> Douglas Richardson schreef:
>>
>>> Dear Todd ~
>>>
>>> Your favorite debating ploy is to demand that others post their
>>> evidence and cite their sources. People innocently comply and then you
>>> promptly declare they are erroneous and stupid. It must be greatly
>>> satisfying to your ego to demonstrate that a fellow poster is less
>>> intelligent than you are. This time, the tables are turned and you are
>>> the one asked to provide your evidence and cite your sources. You
>>> refuse. How predictable, Todd.
>>>
>>> Whatever your reasons, it does nothing for you to keep repeating "I'm
>>> right, I'm right, I'm right." If you're unwilling to post your own
>>> evidence and cite your own sources, you are merely expressing an
>>> opinion. And, we all have opinions. In the future, I encourage you to
>>> lay your cards on the table, state your case, and and risk being
>>> criticized by your peers. You'll learn far more that way and become a
>>> more humble person in the process.
>>>
>>> I think I can speak for most people who are newsgroup members. We're
>>> here to learn about medieval genealogy and make friends, not play a
>>> one-upmanship game. If we want to compete, we can do that anyday on
>>> the tennis or raquetball court.
>>>
>>> Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah
>>>
>>> Website: www.royalancestry.net
>>
>
>
> --=20
> Tim Powys-Lybbe=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0tim@po=
wys.org
> =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0For a miscellany of bygones: http:=
//powys.org
>
>
---559023410-1804928587-1133815568=:9116--

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: why do countries become democracies?
    ... It was in my opinion illegal. ... with evidence for the legal situation. ... bank but let's just set aside the law. ... A cite is a reference to a piece of text where someone lays out the ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: William de Lancaster Is uncle, Ketel Fitz Eldred
    ... promptly declare they are erroneous and stupid. ... the one asked to provide your evidence and cite your sources. ... opinion. ...
    (soc.genealogy.medieval)
  • Re: Fitz Alan vs. Arundel
    ... We're talking about evidence here, dear, not your opinion. ... I posted details of the archives of Arundel ... Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah ...
    (soc.genealogy.medieval)
  • Re: ARLO..I CALL YOUR BLUFF
    ... Paul has my cell phone number. ... Oh, you claim to be able to cite posts I made years ago, but you can't ... Lie detectors cannot be used as evidence in court. ... because you would always insist that was not a valid cite. ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: ARLO..I CALL YOUR BLUFF
    ... since William Coleman and Paul Gennaro ... Then why would he have your cell phone number and why would you instruct ... Oh, you claim to be able to cite posts I made years ago, but you can't ... Lie detectors cannot be used as evidence in court. ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)