Re: Confusion over John, Constable of Chester
- From: WJhonson@xxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 19:36:11 +0000 (UTC)
In a message dated 9/30/05 7:42:09 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
royalancestry@xxxxxxx writes:
<< namely Roger de Lacy, born say 1165, Alan Fitz Roland,
born in or before 1175, and Roger de Quincy, born say 1185. Alan and
Roger were married to the daughter and granddaughter respectively of
Roger de Lacy, yet only about twenty years separate the three men from
one another. To say this is unusual is putting it mild. As a general
rule, a mimimum of 50 years difference in age separates a man from his
granddaughter's husband. >>
But I should point out these alledged birthyears are all .... made up !
For all we know John de Lacy, Constable of Chester had these children off a
later wife and they were born when he was well into his 50s.
You are tossing out birthyears as guesses and then building upon these as
foundation blocks.
Will Johnson
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Henry VIII descendants
- Next by Date: Re: Errors in medieval records
- Previous by thread: Re: Confusion over John, Constable of Chester
- Next by thread: Errors in medieval records
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|