Re: Evidence re. the identity of Alan Fitz Roland'as first wife, _____ de Lacy

Dear Peter ~

I see you're doing the usual bob and weave we get from you, when you're
asked to produce some evidence, and have none. That plus the normal
insults. When you have some evidence to put on the table, by all
means, let's renew the discussion.

Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah

Website: www.royalancestry.net

Peter Stewart wrote:
> Richardson wrote;
>
> <snip of the usual rubbish>
>
> > I don't know of any evidence that a cadet branch ever held Kippax,
> > Yorkshire. If you know of such evidence, please, please let me
> > know.
>
> We all know already the evidence that Alan of Galloway received Kippax
> from his wife's father, named Richard and described as father also of
> John. The only persons fitting those names who could have belonged to
> the Lacy lineage at the appropriate time were Roger de Lacy's younger
> brother Richard de Chester, and a son of his. There is no mystery about
> "such evidence": it is the subject of the entire discussion.
>
> Richardson wants to stuff it & carve it like another of his
> genealogical turkeys, but unfortunately for him Uriah has absconded
> with the cooking implements, and these will have to be sought along
> with him....in Turkey!
>
> Peter Stewart

.

Relevant Pages