Re: C.P. Correction: Elizabeth de Lisle, wife of Edmund Peverel


Douglas Richardson royalancestry@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Dear CED ~

To the Newsgroup:

Again, as has often been the case when DR is caught in an awkward
position, DR is attempting to twist the case, shift the burden. He asks
that I prove him wrong. That is not, and was not, the question. He
says that CP, both the note (i) on page 73 of volume VIII and the chart
after page 48 of that volume, are wrong. Both the note and the chart
indicate that Robert Peverel was the second husband of Alice de Lisle.
If he contends that CP is wrong, according to all standards of
scholarship, the burden of proof is upon DR to prove CP wrong.

If DR cannot put forward evidence that Robert Peverel was not married
to Alice de Lisle, that the CP note and chart are wrong, he should
admit that he has no such evidence. That would end this discussion, a
discussion which he began with an inexplicable post concerning Alice's
sister, Elizabeth de Lisle.

CED
>
> If you have evidence to show that I am wrong, by all means, please post
> it. Otherwise, if you only have an abusive ax to grind (as seems to be
> the case), you should take it to private.
>
> The newsgroup is about medieval genealogy, and making friends.
>
> Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah
>
> Website: www.royalancestry.net
>
> CED wrote:
> > Douglas Richardson royalancestry@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > > Dear CED ~
> >
> > To the Newsgroup:
> >
> > DR seems to think that any comment on his posts other than a compliment
> > is abusive. Again, as in other cases, he seems not to understand a
> > word in the English language: "abusive."
> >
> > I did ask certain questions as to why DR posted the message. The
> > information in his post was inconsistent with the heading which he
> > himself placed on the post. These are legitimate questions to be
> > answered.
> >
> > Why should I take my comments on DR's posts, especially those of his
> > posts which are contrary to netiguette, up in private. Should all
> > criticism of his posts be taken up in private?
> >
> > DR's post itself is not helpful to medieval genealogy; for it misleads
> > and adds no new information.
> >
> > Making friends is not a stated purpose of this group.
> >
> > As for the question of whether Alice de Lisle married, as her second
> > husband, Richard Peverel: if he has evidence that she never married
> > him, he should post it. So far, he has made statements without citing
> > evidence. That is not good medieval genealogy. Does he think that his
> > opinion is superior to CP? If so, he should give us evidence of his
> > qualification to have such superiority.
> >
> > CED
> >
> > >
> > > Reading through your abusive post, one gets the impression you have an
> > > ax to grind. If so, I recommend you take it up in private. The
> > > newsgroup is for medieval genealogy, and for making friends.
> > >
> > > Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah
> > >
> > > Website: www.royalancestry.net

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: C.P. Correction: Elizabeth de Lisle, wife of Edmund Peverel
    ... Still DR will not give us the any evidence that Alice de Lisle was not ... in the past I have pledged to this newsgroup that I would ... > Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah ... >> indicate that Robert Peverel was the second husband of Alice de Lisle. ...
    (soc.genealogy.medieval)
  • Re: C.P. Correction: Elizabeth de Lisle, wife of Edmund Peverel
    ... if he has evidence that she never married ... That is not good medieval genealogy. ... >> newsgroup is for medieval genealogy, ... >> Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah ...
    (soc.genealogy.medieval)
  • Re: C.P. Correction: Elizabeth de Lisle, wife of Edmund Peverel
    ... if he has evidence that she never married ... That is not good medieval genealogy. ... > newsgroup is for medieval genealogy, ... > Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah ...
    (soc.genealogy.medieval)
  • Re: C.P. Correction: Elizabeth de Lisle, wife of Edmund Peverel
    ... If you have evidence to show that I am wrong, by all means, please post ... The newsgroup is about medieval genealogy, ... Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah ... > posts which are contrary to netiguette, up in private. ...
    (soc.genealogy.medieval)
  • Re: Boob and Steelseive - here is your ng
    ... all those people for posting in a newsgroup where they do not belong. ... so is toxemia being the cause of disease. ... because there is no evidence for it. ... were correct, you would have proven homeopathy wrong, not using ...
    (misc.health.alternative)