Re: Here's the plan
- From: <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 00:18:36 -0000
All
I believe like everone else says ... that information is for sharing BUT
what I am against is using freely given information and then charging for it
! to some unsuspecting individuals....
Any info I have on my site which I don't want "nicked" is encrypted using
Taglock pro software at http://www.tagslock.com/
It doesn't stop anyone "reading" it but doesn't allow stealing it !
regards
Bill
PS - No interests or connections to this software at ALL
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kurt" <kurt.fredriksson@xxxxxxxx>
Newsgroups: soc.genealogy.computing
To: <gencmp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2008 4:59 PM
Subject: Re: Here's the plan
"J. Hugh Sullivan" <Eagle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4932a756.3741765@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 12:04:27 +0000, Ian Goddardwithout
<goddai01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bhoggatt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Nov 29, 6:22 am, Tim Powys-Lybbe <t...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In message of 29 Nov, Bhogg...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Mr. Alciere:
Please explain your method of taking copyrighted information
copywrightable,permission from other websites.I am reasonably sure that in most countries data is not
is itsonly the method of presentation is.
In any case the must more serious problem with this sort of data
sources ofveracity: what information is given about the reproducible
worthless.the data? The average website has no such information, so is
t...@xxxxxxxxx
--
Tim Powys-Lybbe
theFor a miscellany of bygones:http://powys.org/
I beg to differ. The presentation on the web is the coyrightable
component. Scraping web sites and not producing it from your own
sources is a violation and often times the reason that many
researchers stop providing information.
For one thing the OP wasn't about scraping websites, it was about
uploading of original transcripts.
And for another, anyone who wants to publish but not have what he
published used by others needs to ask himself why he published in
it!!!!first place. For goodness' sake - SHARE information, don't hoard
A
--
Ian
People need to be educated about sourcing when they use shared data.
source is where a person got the data, not where someone else gotthe
data (except as a secondary source).
Too many times we find that data we researched over a long period of
time is scavenged by others who show themselves as the source.
Hugh
So what?
I have published my research together with sources. I´m doing it for
my own pleasure and don´t mind if other researchers are copying the
information. Please observe that I said "the information" not MY
information.
As Ian said: "For goodness' sake - SHARE information, don't hoard
it!!!!"
Kurt F
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
GENCMP-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes
in the subject and the body of the message
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Here's the plan
- From: Tim Powys-Lybbe
- Re: Here's the plan
- Next by Date: Re: Here's the plan
- Next by thread: Re: Here's the plan
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|