Re: Baptising illegitimate children
- From: eve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 12:11:23 +0100
eve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Searching for records of a boy child who appears to be illegtimate as
his birth certificate gives his mother's name but no father, I went on
to search among baptismal and christening records. I can't find any
trace of these for him, though he shows up in later censuses. Was
there some prohibition about the baptism of illegitimate children?
Absolutely not - and in some cases, the mother was more likely to be
coerced into baptising by the authorities. However, there was no
compulsion to baptise children (at least after about 1720) and far
more people did not bother with churchgoing than did. The 1851
survey of religious worship showed that only about a third of the
population attended the 'established' Church of England, so you may
find a baptism in a chapel (or birth registration for Baptists)
He's a rather curious case because (if I'm correct) his mother wasfather
Louisa Cowell, his name is William Cowell born 1847 but with no
named But in a Census of 1851 a William Cowell is shown as livingHoiw do you work that out? If Benjamin is head of the family, then
with his grandparents (Louisa's parents Benjain and Sarah) and his
father, Daniel Cowell!
yes, Daniel would be called his son, and the boy William his
grandson, but that doesn't mean Daniel was his father, rather than his
uncle.
EVE
Author of The McLaughlin Guides for Family Historians
Secretary, Bucks Genealogical Society
.
- Prev by Date: Order of Precedence
- Next by Date: Re: Mail Delivery Failure.
- Previous by thread: Re: Baptising illegitimate children
- Next by thread: Re: Baptising illegitimate children
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|