Re: WW1 wounded shipped back to UK?
- From: Don Aitken <don-aitken@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:37:54 +0100
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:01:17 +0100, Graeme Wall
<Graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In message <tsndb45rg5rfhuu3634bidruqrcmbqe50h@xxxxxxx>Drifting a bit, but I found it interesting - someone on another group
Don Aitken <don-aitken@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No part of the Netherlands was occupied by the Germans - the country
was neutral throughout.
I wasn't sure whether they may have occupied the Walcheren penisular to
control the access to Antwerpen, much as they did in The Great War - the
sequel.
has probably pinned down the first use of "First World War". Many
people, including H.G.Wells, used it before WWII, but the earliest
seems to be the war correspondant Col. Repington, who used it as the
title of his memoirs, published in 1920. The memoirs are in diary
form, and the phrase first occurs in 1918, before the end of the war.
--
Don Aitken
Mail to the From: address is not read.
To email me, substitute "clara.co.uk" for "freeuk.com"
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: WW1 wounded shipped back to UK?
- From: Chris Dickinson
- Re: WW1 wounded shipped back to UK?
- From: Andrew Sellon
- Re: WW1 wounded shipped back to UK?
- References:
- WW1 wounded shipped back to UK?
- From: Lesley Robertson
- WW1 wounded shipped back to UK?
- Prev by Date: Re: Wills & Women's Rights?
- Next by Date: Re: Wills & Women's Rights?
- Previous by thread: WW1 wounded shipped back to UK?
- Next by thread: Re: WW1 wounded shipped back to UK?
- Index(es):