Re: Lifeless births
- From: Anne Chambers <anne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:00:03 +0930
Don Moody wrote:
In any case, genealogically stillbirths do not, by definition, contribute any descendants to the family tree so what is the urge to find them?
Don
Possibly because a family history of stillbirths has genetic implications which are currently relevant ?
--
Anne Chambers,
South Australia
anne dot chambers at bigpond dot com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Lifeless births
- From: Don Moody
- Re: Lifeless births
- References:
- Lifeless births
- From: Richard van Schaik
- Re: Lifeless births
- From: Don Moody
- Lifeless births
- Prev by Date: Re: Lifeless births
- Next by Date: Re: Lifeless births
- Previous by thread: Re: Lifeless births
- Next by thread: Re: Lifeless births
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|