Re: £200-a-time ancestral test kits are a rip off, say experts

In article <mailman.642.1210968799.4679.genbrit@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Roy Stockdill <roy.stockdill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: John Cartmell <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

In article <3130303030373135482D7B9C09@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
MB <MB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
BBC Radio 4's You and Yours programme has an item about this on at
the moment, it should be available on Listen Again / iPlayer later
in the day

I caught part of it. They didn't seem to progress beyond the
lamentable standard of the Mail: did you hear more.>

I don't understand why you are being so deliberately pig-headed about
this, John. You seem utterly determined to miss the point!

I'm not. I haven't read the article in Ancestors. I have read the Mail article
and that is lamentable.

As I have repeatedly told you, it was NOT an original Mail article. They
simply reported what they found in Ancestors magazine. Newspapers do
this, "lifting" stories from other publications, all the time.

Why don't you go and buy a copy of Ancestors and read the original
instead of harping on about the Mail? Then you will at least be able to
discover whether it was any different.

I understand that Ancestors had a positive article in the January issue - so
why the difference?

--
John
.