Re: Thanks, plus a Liverpool question

"Liz Owen" <l.owen@xxxxxxx> wrote in
news:47f11993$0$28767$426a74cc@xxxxxxxxxxxx:

Thanks Peter The reference is HO 107 Piece 2185 Folio 728 Page 13.
His name is William Owen

It is odd, isn't it? Why should he be the only man without a specified
regiment (apart from famlies)? At first I assumed that "private" was his
rank. Now I wonder if he was a civilian servant employed privately by one
of the officers. Is there any other evidence of him being in the army? If
he was, presumably it should be possible to get hold of his papers.


--
Family History Research in London & Kent
http://www.goodey.me.uk
.