Re: Want more Evidence -- HERE!

RICLAND <riclanders@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've presented my evidence. What part of it do you dispute?

Oh for goodness sake - what is wrong with you?

You produce images of three portraits and label two of them
forgeries without anything to support your assertion that any
of them are forgeries.

You assert that it's "evidence that people in high places were
motivated to commission a different likeness" with nothing
to support that position.

You assert that the first image is evidence that she had a
black father with nothing to support that position.

And so it goes on, assertion after assertion with nothing
to support your position. And buster, that ain't evidence.
It's the stuff of lunatic conspiracy theories - of fanciful
fiction like the Da Vinci Code. Just because you can weave
a narrative which touches reality at a number of points does
not attest to the truth of that narrative.

So there are three images of the young lady which differ
slightly in facial features - so what? Which one is the most
faithful - the most "photographic"? We simply don't know.
Were the artists trying to be accurate, or working to an
agenda? We don't know. Were the artists who painted images 2
and 3 trying to make her look less 'black' than was really
the case, or was the artist who produced image 1 trying to
make her look more 'black' than was really the case? Or
were the artists each trying to accurately paint what they
saw? We simply don't know. So are the three images "evidence"
of an original, faithful image followed by two forgeries
commissioned by 'people in high places' to hide the awful
truth. No mate - they are not.

--
Brian Pears
Gateshead, UK
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Re: Re: Re: SKS means spongers and scroungers!
    ... I was merely responding to your incorrect assertion. ... You repeatedly tell me that the images on Ancestry's site aren't their ... The actual situation is that *BOTH* NA and Ancestry have a copyright ... derivative work (and doubtless reserved rights to themselves as to further ...
    (soc.genealogy.britain)
  • Re: Re: Re: Re: SKS means spongers and scroungers!
    ... I was merely responding to your incorrect assertion. ... You repeatedly tell me that the images on Ancestry's site aren't their ... The actual situation is that *BOTH* NA and Ancestry have a copyright ... derivative work (and doubtless reserved rights to themselves as to further ...
    (soc.genealogy.britain)
  • Re: Want more Evidence -- HERE!
    ... You produce images of three portraits and label two of them ... You assert that it's "evidence that people in high places were ... to support that position. ... assertion after assertion with nothing ...
    (soc.genealogy.britain)
  • Re: SKS means spongers and scroungers!
    ... I was merely responding to your incorrect assertion. ... You repeatedly tell me that the images on Ancestry's site aren't their ... The majority of them are not the copyright property of Ancestry. ...
    (soc.genealogy.britain)
  • Re: JPEG Lossless decompression
    ... I have the viewer to the point were I support all common ... formats except compressed images, which is my next area of work.. ... compression/decompression routines for JPEG Baseline, ...
    (comp.protocols.dicom)