Re: Additional extraction.
- From: "Geoff" <NOJOY@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 21:25:47 GMT
"cecilia" <myths@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1182623031.552119.189640@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 23 Jun, 14:25, "Geoff" <N...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
What do you think apart from
the fact that it pays to check sources of
extracted batches?
After reading the thread "IGI Entries", I think it would be helpful if
you indicated whether your questions were rhetorical or not, eg by use
of <rhet> and <non-rhet>.
Did you not notice that Don was switched on by them
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Additional extraction.
- From: Ken Gibb
- Re: Additional extraction.
- References:
- Additional extraction.
- From: Geoff
- Re: Additional extraction.
- From: cecilia
- Additional extraction.
- Prev by Date: Re: Bartholomew Street, Exeter
- Next by Date: Re: Help for a Newbie please
- Previous by thread: Re: Additional extraction.
- Next by thread: Re: Additional extraction.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|