Re: Odd surname entry
- From: Hugh Watkins <hugh.watkins@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 04:38:34 +0100
Grum wrote:
It's a mis-transcription - on the image, he is just George A do Son.
the previous household was BENNETT
Image on its way to you.
Anne
Wow, that was quick. That's another one solved.
Thank you so much 'again' Anne,
Graham
but why didn't you check the original source yourself ?
the image
free to use at many family history cneters and public libraries
Hugh W
--
new phone = new daily blog
http://upsrev622.blogspot.com/
family history
http://hughw36.blogspot.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Odd surname entry
- From: Grum
- Re: Odd surname entry
- References:
- Odd surname entry
- From: Grum
- Re: Odd surname entry
- From: Anne Chambers
- Re: Odd surname entry
- From: Grum
- Odd surname entry
- Prev by Date: Deleting from the IGI . . . the answer !
- Next by Date: What is SOG was Re: Quest for Thomas Bailly around 1640
- Previous by thread: Re: Odd surname entry
- Next by thread: Re: Odd surname entry
- Index(es):