Re: Donald P.Moody
- From: Liz <pandora@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 07:25:26 +0100
Evelyn Weir wrote:
I could have sent more but I am a dummy with the computer and didn't know how to fit the information into my screen.
Dear Evelyn,
Just a couple of points in a friendly way before people start getting snippy <g> .....
First off, it is a good idea to check what others have already posted to make sure that you are not repeating old stuff. Sometimes you will not have received recent posts but the ones containing the same info as this one were sent more than 24 hrs ago so you should have them ...
And more to the point .... this is the second time you have started a new thread with a slightly different title but on the same subject. You need to learn how to post your message as a *reply* to something already said. It makes it easier in so many ways for a thread that has only one subject of discussion to continue under one header .... not least so that those who are bored with it can skip over it more easily .... This began as 'Don!' then you started a thread 'Don Moody' and now you have started 'Re Donald P Moody'. It will probably save you a lot of aggravation to learn how to do a reply in yout software .....
And I suggest losing that membership number in your sig as it does not refer to the newsgroup/List
This advice offered in a friendly way to improve your enjoyment of the group.
Cheers
Liz (Greenwich UK)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Donald P.Moody
- From: "JAPhilip"
- Re: Donald P.Moody
- References:
- Donald P.Moody
- From: "Evelyn Weir"
- Donald P.Moody
- Prev by Date: probate
- Next by Date: Re: Matthew Jackson (1612-1668) - will transcript - comments
- Previous by thread: Donald P.Moody
- Next by thread: Re: Donald P.Moody
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|