Re: Birth Re-registration
- From: Charles Ellson <charles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 01:13:15 +0000
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 00:18:25 +0000 (UTC), roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ("Roy
Stockdill") wrote:
>> From: "CWatters" <colin.watters@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>> "Charani" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:439f5600$0$94841$892e7fe2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 22:59:24 +0000 (UTC), "Roy Stockdill" wrote:
>> >
>> > > I see no more reason why sex-change people should be protected from
>> > > others knowing the facts than the illegitimate.
>> >
>> > It isn't as if the fact can be concealed easily
>>
>> Not quite sure what you mean? How would you know?>
>
>I met a number of sex-change people when I was in newpapers and,
>rest assured, you can tell !
>
Weren't your circumstances likely to have involved people who to some
extent had selected themselves and where you had prior knowledge ?
Some (although not all) of the people on the more medically-inclined
television programmes would seem to have a very good chance of walking
down the street without being noticed.
--
_______
+---------------------------------------------------+ |\\ //|
| Charles Ellson: charles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | | \\ // |
+---------------------------------------------------+ | > < |
| // \\ |
Alba gu brath |//___\\|
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Birth Re-registration
- From: Graeme Wall
- Re: Birth Re-registration
- References:
- Re: Birth Re-registration
- From: CWatters
- Re: Birth Re-registration
- From: "Roy Stockdill"
- Re: Birth Re-registration
- Prev by Date: Re: Birth Re-registration
- Next by Date: Re: Jeremy Paxman weeps over tragic ancestor
- Previous by thread: Re: Birth Re-registration
- Next by thread: Re: Birth Re-registration
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|