Re: Bu+~a nay tui a(n chay ...
- From: halong <ccon67@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:22:20 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 9, 1:54 pm, ":))" <bennypo...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 9, 10:59 am, halong <cco...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:> to^.i lo^~i, to^.i lo^~i
Bu+a~ nay tui a(n chay, ne^n kho^ng da'm tie^'p chuye^.n ngu+o+i` o+?
truo^n`g
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mo^.t chi. no. co' ti'nh ngu? me^; ngu? me^ qua', dde^'n no^~i mo^.t
ho^m chi. em, ho. khie^ng ra chu`a, ho. ca.o tro.c ca? dda^`u ddi, ma`
cu~ng va^~n ngu? kho^ng bie^'t gi` suo^'t.
Ðe^'n khi tro+? da^.y, tha^'y mi`nh o+? chu`a, ma` so+` le^n dda^`u
thi` kho^ng tha^'y to'c; la^'y la`m nghi ngo+`\. Cha(?ng bie^'t co'
pha?i mi`nh kho^ng, hay la` su+, mo+'i ho?i ra(`ng :
-- Ta hay su+ ? ... Su+ hay ta ?... Ta o+i, Halong +i, co' pha?i ta
kho^ng... hu+? ta ?
Cha(?ng tha^'y thu+a, mo+'i la^?m ba^?m ra(`ng :
-- Cu+' the^' o+? truo^`ng ddi ve^` nha` thu+? xem thi` bie^'t : he^~
pha?i ta thi` cho' no' kho^ng ca('n, ma` kho^ng pha?i ta , thi` no'
ca('n !
Be`n ddu+'ng da^.y ddi ve^`.
Nhu+ng ma` ve^` dde^'n nha`, cho' no' tha^'y dda^`u tro.c, mo'ng tay
da`i va` tho^'i um....di. da.ng.
Cho' no' ca('n ra^`m le^n. Chi. ta cha('c la` kho^ng pha?i mi`nh
ro^`i, bo? nha` ddi bie^.t, kho^ng ve^` nu+~a.
:-))))
Truye^.n hay ha(m !
to^.i lo^~i, to^.i lo^~i
Bu+a~ nay tui a(n chay, ne^n kho^ng da'm nghe va` ba`n chuye^.n tie^'u
la^m vo+'i ma^'y ngu+o+i` o+? truo^n`g
:-))))
.
- References:
- Bu+~a nay tui a(n chay ...
- From: halong
- Re: Bu+~a nay tui a(n chay ...
- From: :))
- Re: Bu+~a nay tui a(n chay ...
- From: halong
- Re: Bu+~a nay tui a(n chay ...
- From: :))
- Bu+~a nay tui a(n chay ...
- Prev by Date: Co`n kho?ang 1,500 na(m nu*~a...
- Next by Date: Re: Chi. U't: DDo'i cho sa.ch ra'ch cho tho+m !!!
- Previous by thread: Re: Bu+~a nay tui a(n chay ...
- Next by thread: CA new law in 2012: boosters or busted
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|