Re: The price translates to $1,238 per pound

On Jan 5, 5:28 pm, ":))" <bennypo...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 14:16:56 -0800 (PST), hotac <hochim...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

http://www.thienlybuutoa.org/Misc/NanDoiNamAtDau1945.htm

Cho ca'i gto'm lu*o*.c va` to^?ng ke^'t y' tu*o*?ng va` hie^?u bie^'t
cu?a mi`nh.

Chu*' co`n pe^'t ca'i link cu?a o^ng Tra^`n Gia Phu.ng vo^ dda^y thi`
cu~ng kho^ng no'i le^n ddu*o*.c gi` nhie^`u.

Note: Tra^`n Gia Phu.ng cu~ng chi? la` ngu*o*`i ddi ti`m hie^?u va`
vie^'t la.i su*? VN hie^.n dda.i tho^i. Ve^` pha^`n quan ddie^?m cu?a
o^ng ta nhi`n ve^` su*. vie^.c thi` co' cho^~ ddu'ng va` sai. Chu*a
ha(?n la` [Su*?] .

;-))))

So what's your points of view here, me xu*` Hotac ?

Mo^.t ba`i vie^'t nga('n go.n nhu+ the^' ma` kho^ng ddo.c ddu+o+.c
dde^? na('m ca'i y' thi` chu+'ng to? mi`nh tho^ng minh qua' cho+`i cho
+`i !!!!
.

Relevant Pages