Re: HA~Y KA"M O+N MA^~U QUO^'C VA` THIE^N TRIE^`U

From: hung <hung_tam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 07:37:50 -0800 (PST)

Me. kie^'p o+? dda^'y ma` "chung mo^.t lo`ng". Chung mo^.t "no`ng
su'ng" thi` co'. No`ng AK cu?a no' pho+ thi` sa.ch tro+n, ddi ca?
dda'm.
No' qua dda^y thi` no' ngo^`i tre^n dda^`u tre^n co^?, chi? nghe
tie^'ng ddi.t cu?a no' kho^ng cu~ng che^'t. La`m gi` ra?nh rang ma`
"cu`ng nghe tie^'ng ga` ga'y"? Tie^'ng Ta`u ga'y thi` co'.
Kho^ng nho+' ca'i tho+`i no' ba('t ddi mo` so` mo` ngao sao? La^u
qua' ro^`i que^n he^'t.
Mao sa.ch kho^ng mao sa.ch lo^ng
Ti`nh hu+~u nghi. ta xuo^'ng bie^?n ddo^ng mo` so`.
.

References:
- HA~Y KA"M O+N MA^~U QUO^'C VA` THIE^N TRIE^`U
  - From: Elchinoboatconscience
- Re: HA~Y KA"M O+N MA^~U QUO^'C VA` THIE^N TRIE^`U
  - From: hochimanh

Prev by Date: Ba.n bie^'t chu+a ? ?
Next by Date: Re: 1750 ty? ddo^ la tha^m thu?ng trong na(m 2009
Previous by thread: Re: HA~Y KA"M O+N MA^~U QUO^'C VA` THIE^N TRIE^`U
Next by thread: ca(ng nha` di ddo^.ng
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread