Re: Su+ Ve.m Gia?i Oan
- From: BenLong <pb5511@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 12:30:04 -0700
On Aug 26, 10:49 am, hochim...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Su+ ve.m phen na`y quye^'t gia?i oan,
La`ng Ho^`n co^.c dda('ng kha('p nu+o+'c non.
Vui lo`ng nha` nu+o+'c, to^'t ma(.t dda?ng,
Cu'ng du+o+`ng kha kha' nhe' ba` con!
Tui nghi~ ne^'u o^ng su* na`y lo tranh dda^'u lua^.t ba?o ve^. thu'
va^.t va` ddo`i ho?i tro*. ca^'p welfare cho da^n nghe`o ta.i VN
gio^'ng nhu* ta.i ca'c nu*o*'c Ta^y Phu*o*ng thi` co' co^ng qua? ho*n
la` ddi gia?i oan. Pha^.t ba?o tu*. ddo^'t dduo^'c la^'y ma` ddi,
kho^ng ai co' the^? cu*'u gia?i nghie^.p cu?a ke? kha'c ddu*o*.c.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Su+ Ve.m Gia?i Oan
- From: Voo
- Re: Su+ Ve.m Gia?i Oan
- References:
- Su+ Ve.m Gia?i Oan
- From: hochimanh
- Su+ Ve.m Gia?i Oan
- Prev by Date: Re: Seattle - Na('ng dde.p
- Next by Date: Re: DDie^?m sa'ch 'Chie^'n tha('ng bo? lo+~' - 'Triumph Forsaken' cu?a Mark Moyar
- Previous by thread: Su+ Ve.m Gia?i Oan
- Next by thread: Re: Su+ Ve.m Gia?i Oan
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|