Re: WMDS FOUND [old crap]
- From: "staten" <staten@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:05:03 -0400
"Andrzej Adam Filip" <anfi@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:87mzc4xpn0.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> "staten" <staten@xxxxxxxxx>
writes:
"Andrzej Adam Filip" <anfi@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:87ac85fbny.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"FRANKIE" <phebelee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
The long awaited truths that will boost Bush admin credibility has
arrived.So many years had gone by and the anti-Bush people blame Bush
on this issue.This new shocking revelation of about 500 WMDs found in
Iraq,justifying the war in Iraq finally deal a serious blows to
Anti-Bush people.
So many false things and comments that were written and said about
Bush had became so monstrously full,and decent people wonder,how are
all these medias,like BBC,CNN and others,politicians and pundits going
to repay Bush and USA government,and the military,all the slanders and
injustices done against them?
[...]
Post link to the news release on major news agency website *OR SHUT UP*.
Colin Powell words before UN Security Council has been recorded.
Read them again and tell us more about "the truth (in Bush version)".
Update your old , foolish "Bush lied " stories. It's not funny
anymore. The only who lied here is you - the anti war ragtag gang of
red/pinky scum, PC losers and opportunistic political charlatans
like Kerry and
Murtha.
[ quotes from http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200601,00.html ]
As I can see you are proud/shameless to display your *ignorance* in
public. With great pleasure I will help you to achieve your goal:
Did you read the entire foxnews article, or just picked lines fitting your
pacifist, antiwar crap? Just taking a glance at your comment it's obviously
that you didn't . It's much easier to pick just several lines supporting
your point, to supply a stupid comment in unison, to add a piece from the
hindustantimes and here we go the proof of your righteousness is ready . But
you failed to prove anything. . And you failed miserably.
First off, you did not complete the quote of the senior Defence Department
official hoping that just selecting several lines from the entire context is
enough to humbug your readers. Here is what you conveniently cut out :
"The official said the findings did raise questions about the years of
weapons inspections that had not resulted in locating the fairly sizeable
stash of chemical weapons. And he noted that it may say something about
Hussein's intent and desire. The report does suggest that some of the
weapons were likely put on the black market and may have been used outside
Iraq.
He also said that the Defense Department statement shortly after the March
2003 invasion saying that "we had all known weapons facilities secured," has
proven itself to be untrue.
"It turned out the whole country was an ammo dump," he said, adding that on
more than one occasion, a conventional weapons site has been uncovered and
chemical weapons have been discovered mixed within them."
What all that means? It means that the UN inspection proved to be a total
fiasco. It means that Saddam did not destroy his weapons stockpiles. It
means that WMD are still in Iraq . It means the weapons may yet fall into
the hands of terrorists if American troops are prematurely withdrawn from
Iraq.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200601,00.html
<quote>
A senior Defense Department official, however, made the following
clarifications:
* These findings do not reflect a WMD capacity that was built up after
1991.
* These are not the WMDs this country and the rest of the world believed
Iraq had.
* These are not the WMDs for which this country went to war.
</quote>
http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1726368,001300180001.htm
<quote>
The chemical weapons that have been recovered by US forces in Iraq were
all made before the 1991 Gulf War and were too degraded for their
intended use, US intelligence officials said.
Republican lawmakers have cast the disclosure that about 500 chemical
weapons have been found in Iraq as evidence that Saddam Hussein had a
stockpile of the weapons before the March 2003, US invasion of Iraq.
But the intelligence officials, who briefed reporters on condition of
anonymity, said the weapons were too degraded to have posed a threat to
US forces in March 2003.
</quote>
Hogwash. No matter how the weapon is degraded but in hands of terrorists it
represents a grave danger to thousands of civilians if smuggled to our
cities. Even if one of such ammunitions is delivered it will cause a
catastrophic outcome. However, not just one but 500 have been discovered.
Still more weapons exist in the country . Santorum clearly stated that
referring to the report by the National Ground Intelligence Center:
"Since 2003, coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons
munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent. Despite many
efforts to locate and destroy Iraq's pre-Gulf War chemical munitions, filled
and unfilled pre-Gulf War chemical munitions are assessed to still exist."
"The report warns about the hazards that the chemical weapons could still
pose to coalition troops in Iraq."The purity of the agents inside the
munitions depends on many factors, including the manufacturing process,
potential additives and environmental storage conditions. While agents
degrade over time, chemical warfare agents remain hazardous and potentially
lethal," Santorum read from the document."
"This says weapons have been discovered, more weapons exist and they state
that Iraq was not a WMD-free zone, that there are continuing threats from
the materials that are or may still be in Iraq," said Rep. Pete Hoekstra,
R-Mich., chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.
The weapons are thought to be manufactured before 1991 so they would not be
proof of an ongoing WMD program in the 1990s. But they do show that Saddam
Hussein was lying when he said all weapons had been destroyed, and it shows
that years of on-again, off-again weapons inspections did not uncover these
munitions."
And finally here is a summary overview of key points sent by the NGIC to
Santorum and Hoekstra at their request. It is in a stark contradiction with
the bullcrap you dig out from the hindustantimes. It also was offered by the
foxnews article to read.
" Subject: Iraqi Chemical Munitions.
Purpose: This summary provides an unclassified overview of chemical
munitions recovered in Iraq since May 2004.
Key points:
--Since 2003 Coalition forces recovered approximately 500 weapons munitions
which contain mustard or sarin nerve agaent
--Despite many efforts to locate and destroy Iraq's pre-Gulf War chemical
munitions, filled and unfilled pre-Gulf War chemical munitions are assessed
to still exist.
--"Pre-Gulf War Iraqi chemical weapons could be sold on the Black Market.
Use of these weapons by terrorist or insurgent groups would have
implications for coalition forces in Iraq. The possibility of use outside of
Iraq cannot be ruled out.
---The most likely munitions remaining are sarin- and mustard-filled
projectiles.
--The puity of these agent inside the munitions depends on many factors,
including the manufacturing process, potential additives, and environmental
storage conditions. While agents degrade over time , chemical warfare agents
remain hazardues and potentially lethal
--It has been reported in open press that insurgents and Iraqi groups desire
to acquire and use chemical weapons."
Congratulations , you did a good job in making a fool of yourself. Next time
think before piling your pacifist rubbish on your readers. As I said , it's
not funny anymore. It's stupid.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Native Americans Say Mexicans Have "The Right To Be Anywhere On This Continent"
- Next by Date: Re: Katrina is God's feedback for global warming
- Previous by thread: Re: Native Americans Say Mexicans Have "The Right To Be Anywhere On This Continent"
- Next by thread: Re: Katrina is God's feedback for global warming
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
