Re: question to the Turkish friends

On 2 nov, 01:48, "Jaksa" <Ja...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Uzytkownik "Deniz85" <lpu0...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> napisal w wiadomoscinews:1193962590.097292.296220@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On 1 nov, 21:28, "Jaksa" <Ja...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Uzytkownik "Acephale Lemar" <noma...@xxxxxxxxxxx> napisal w

wiadomoscinews:fgaeu7$1apc$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx







I think that Germans have enough cultural substance in former
DDR "East-Germany" to consider it part of their nationhood.

Your criteria isn't enough to me, it's poor, arbitrary. What is today
called "America" as continent, not USA, wasn't home of so called
"white" people. So called "indians" were the owner of this continent.

Well. Americans are very fast loosing their 'white' attribute,
and it is expected to be 1/3 non-white by 2025-2030.

I don't think that America today, especialy it being in firm Jewish
merciless grasp, can still be considered as West extension.

It is already becoming something different.

All their "cultural centred" had been destroyed, most of these people
had been killed. If the "indians" would declare to be the owner of this
continent, do you really think that the goverment of USA and other
states on this continent would allow this? Wake up, man!

So? Indians are 3 millions, and all Americans 300 millions.
Turks are 55 millions and Kurds 25 millions.

This is what makes it different, aside concentration pattern.
Are there any native Turkish settlements in south-east Turkey?

Some I do. None of them is on the scale even remotely
comparable to the issue of Kurdistan.

Well, the only reason for this situation is that these states are a
relevant part of "west" or of EU, they control the media better (read:
powerful). It must not be on the same level of aggression; important is
that all these countries have internal problems with some humans which
are citizens of these states.

None of those costed ever 30.000 of human lives.
It is simply very different scale.

Don't forget Kosovo, the serbians will
not to do without. They use your criteria.

To hell with Serbs. They are barbarians.
They have fucked up everything what was there to be fucked up.

I think that you're a
revanchist.

I am. But in reasonable limits. I wish back Lwow and Wilno
but I don't give damn for Kieyv or some remote wastes.

What doesn't waer Polish cultural imprint or stamp (like Kieyv)
I completely don't bother, even if it had been controlled by
Poland for hundreds of years. Hence my question, what
motivates you in Kurdistan?

OK, admittedly, EU/west is not in the best shape, but the reason
for that is external to organizational forms of it, rather cultural
development which is taking place should be blamed.

The source of evil in not in Brussels, but in Hollywood.

Be sure, without USA the EU couldn't be there where they are(it's?).. I
can see/identify your belly aches, you're mournful because the old
colonialistic european states are not the "Herren"= masters of the

Nothing of that kind actually. When Western Europe has become
colonial superpower in 19 century, my country has went down
from the scene for good 123 year. So no longing for that epoch.

world. Actually they must accept that a *** like USA dominate them.

I don't see any US domination in Europe, other then a cultural,
say - Hollywood based one.

US military bases are only in Germany I think.
And as a Pole I wish they stay there :))

US dollar is a joke today anyway.

Yep, they are Kemalists, they are leftists.

Maybe they are jacobians (I could not find the english word for this, I
mean the most destructive part of the "great"(Hehehe!) french
revolution that have executed their enemies, mates, opponents). Really,
their "ideology" contains leftist *and* rightist cogitations.
Nationalism is rightist, state capitalism is leftist. Just two thoughts
of them to make you lucide.

Nationalism is not always rightist, see nazis or Vietnam commies.
Or Mao Tse Tong. Or Birma today.

They have exactly the same aniclerical and antitraditional zeal,
as any other leftist revolutionary movement in history.

"anticlerical" they were, but I understand under "anticlerical" not he
same, let's call it "antireligious" or against the religion.

OK. Some people are anticlerical while not being anitreligious per se
(or just prettending not to be) but those I also consider sick
(so in my understanding anticlerical = antireligious = mentally sick).

What you don't know is that a little part of turkish nationalists hate
Islam too, they would establish the old turkish religion.

Similar in that to the nazis, who not only hated christianity, but also
tried to promote old germanic pre-christian pagan believes.

Jaksa

The Jews, the old problem of all the world... Die Juden sind sehr
problematisch, ja! Ach, mit die juden, nach Dachau!!!

Are you already brain washed?
You must be probably before 30'thies then.

There are plenty of such robots dwelling in America,
and I see them even in my own american branch family.
Deranged imbeciles, I always laugh at them :))

Jaksa

PS
Show us Deniz, how much you love Jews!- Masquer le texte des messages précédents -

- Afficher le texte des messages précédents -

You're a fucking idiotic and fanatized Catholic extremist who insulted
all intelligent people by insulting the Enlightenment. You say we are
young but you are old and stupid. And as we say, people get old, but
their stupidity doesn't go away!

We are young, intelligent and attractive and not you... *** off idiot

.

Loading