Re: To SCT censor Stefanie.


"maxwell" <mmmaxwell@xxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:
pmNwl.1118$6%.935@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"PG" wrote ...
"maxwell" a écrit ...
"HawaiianEye" wrote ...
PG wrote:
"HawaiianEye" a écrit ...
Krypsis wrote:

I've only looked in on sct for the past three years, but Schweik,
Maxwell and Larb all struck me as various varieties of troll.

Oh, now which one of the sock puppets is this 'eye' creature?

Please excuse me if I disagree with you. I believe that they are the
same variety. They just have different levels of education. Stupidly
got involved in discussing with them a few times, waste of time of
course.

Ah yes, 'PG,' *when* having dripped trollish condescension, refused to
provide ANY substance
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.thai/msg/09ddbedea12da4fd?hl=en&dmode=source>

. . and flung derisive ad hominems--and here is seen more of the same.

Your pot is once again in need of a brillo pad. And you have a most
selective memory. Par for the course for trolls, naturally.

You are of course welcome to make some substantive showing, having
discarded my own.

. . and you of course only demand such of others, while taking refuge in
your own 'authority'

To say such is intellectually dishonest would be a bit of a euphemism ;~)

As trolls go, you are of the worst variety. Spouting condescension and
sophisms, in the guise of an 'educated' eye's view. One that is
transparently shallow, to the more insightful amongst us.
pg

You'd not recognize insight if it bit you on the arse ;~)

FACT is that you AVOID facts and default to the ad hominem.

.. but do troll on !

The difference between you and me is that I look to the start of our
exchange, where I dared to (politely if pointedly) criticise your views. It
was then you - yes, you - that began with the ad hominems. A further
difference is that I am here for one reason alone - to share my knowledge of
Thailand, and to discuss with others, in good faith, who have experience of
the country.

I have absolutely zero interest in putting senseless later exchanges under
the microscope to satisfy some pedantic need of yours, on a ng that is
supposed to serve some other purpose than the study of one's navel.

I have a life, and it is not best spent on a keyboard discussing with
worthless trolling individuals who have nothing to contribute other than
spite and bile.

So you are welcome to talk to yourself. I shall not be able to read your
(inevitable) response. I realise that you are of that group of inadequates
that needs to boost their egos by having the last word. However, you will be
talking to your imaginary audience, not to me, and to the fast dwindling
group of people interested in Thailand on this ng.

I actually feel rather sorry for you and your trolling mates.

<plonk>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: To SCT censor Stefanie.
    ... Maxwell and Larb all struck me as various varieties of troll. ... They just have different levels of education. ... FACT is that you AVOID facts and default to the ad hominem. ...
    (soc.culture.thai)
  • Re: To SCT censor Stefanie.
    ... Maxwell and Larb all struck me as various varieties of troll. ... They just have different levels of education. ... FACT is that you AVOID facts and default to the ad hominem. ...
    (soc.culture.thai)
  • Re: OT: Pop Psych. Quiz - Are You a Bigot? (supplementary questions)
    ... Not that there's anything wrong with Trolling. ... I am somewhat of a Troll myself. ... (Did you know that there are more varieties of Inet Trolls than there ... Troll me once; shame on you. ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: To SCT censor Stefanie.
    ... and Larb all struck me as various varieties of troll. ... They just have different levels of education. ...
    (soc.culture.thai)
  • Re: JF Mezei issuing rogue cancels again
    ... What makes him such a malicious troll? ... >>His trolling is constant, repetitious, relentless. ... JF trolled the circumcision newsgroups for years. ... What's his interest in child sexuality? ...
    (comp.os.vms)