Re: Fortune cookie :-)
- From: "slambert" <slambertNOSPAMPLEASE@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:39:40 -0000
"maxwell" <mmmaxwell@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
We do have a problem with that in France. You can't discuss anything in aSurely prevalence among the many is no rationale for an *individual's*
conflectual environment without going to the godwin point.
transgressions.
Can you please say again?
Stef
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fortune cookie :-)
- From: maxwell
- Re: Fortune cookie :-)
- References:
- Fortune cookie :-)
- From: Magnus
- Re: Fortune cookie :-)
- From: LarbGai
- Re: Fortune cookie :-)
- From: Magnus
- Re: Fortune cookie :-)
- From: Good Soldier Schweik
- Re: Fortune cookie :-)
- From: slambert
- Re: Fortune cookie :-)
- From: Good Soldier Schweik
- Re: Fortune cookie :-)
- From: slambert
- Re: Fortune cookie :-)
- From: Magnus
- Re: Fortune cookie :-)
- From: slambert
- Re: Fortune cookie :-)
- From: maxwell
- Re: Fortune cookie :-)
- From: slambert
- Re: Fortune cookie :-)
- From: maxwell
- Re: Fortune cookie :-)
- From: slambert
- Re: Fortune cookie :-)
- From: maxwell
- Re: Fortune cookie :-)
- From: slambert
- Re: Fortune cookie :-)
- From: maxwell
- Fortune cookie :-)
- Prev by Date: Re: Fortune cookie :-)
- Next by Date: Re: Fortune cookie :-)
- Previous by thread: Re: Fortune cookie :-)
- Next by thread: Re: Fortune cookie :-)
- Index(es):