Re: tmo; is pedophilia off topic in sct?

"On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:35:04 +0700, "Daniel"
<daniel_h_laurent@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote/and/or quoted:
"
>"pluto" <pluto@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:o08je1d5p5nqgknn7f4cmikt29rllp8rus@xxxxxxxxxx
>> "On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:43:35 GMT, LarbGai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (LarbGai)
>> wrote/and/or quoted:
>>In article <1122564885.282678.316050@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> >chabon19@xxxxxxxxx says...
>>
>> hey, k danel, i thought you said something about ALREADY forming a sctm?
>> where is it?
>=========================
>Uh! I haven't said that.
>I advised Cold Pen, who seems to be a bit new on Usenet, to compare
>s.c.japan and s.c.japan. moderated to get a feeling re. the difference.

merci , m daniel for the misunderstanding.
>
>> how many posts have you censored, thrashed and reported to the
>> isp/newsgroups? ;-)
>========================
>I wish to post in a mildly moderated SCT, I don't wish to be a moderator
>simply because I am not qualified for posts in Thai and my knowledge of
>english is not good enough for some delicate and/or domplicated posts
>evaluation.

i have posted some two years ago about the difficulty of juistiying to the
newsgroups board (whoever they are ) the convertion of a std newsgroups to
a moderated one. k tim has different opinion. he could have some inside
info about the newsgroup machination. It will be the day when a new
moderated group is formed !

>
>> you also quoted examples of scj having some 10 000 post a day while scjm
>> has 100
>> your lot will come when your new sctm is formed and you may resort to
>> harakiri when you are overwhelmed with off topics posts which far exceed
>on
>> topic, 100 to one.
>===============================
>No, those figures were not from me but from Nick Cramer. It's not post per
>day but posts available in the server at the time of his checking.

again, apology for my misreading.
>
>> you have oftentimes advised scters to skip skip skip all off topics
>> post---- now you are forming a moderated group!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>> dont you betray, disappoint your scters who hero worhship your french
>> tolerance?
>=================================
>I advised them, and keep on advising them, to skip/delete/skip and the like.
>But, at the stage we are reaching those days, it takes more time to skip and
>delete than to read interesting stuff re. Thailand.
>I am not there talking only of the "flame wars" and other mutual agressions
>but also of the invasion of threads concerning events that are not related
>to Thailand, whether it is US politics, Iraq tragedy, London bombing,
>another tragedy, and the like.

skipping posts is an ART ;-)
dont delete
because you may find the skipped person's point of view is right and can
have the opportunity to recourse to them.
deleting them lose you the gems so to speak, unless you have bags of money
to write to the original isp for the backissues

>
>> i know a lot of OLD OLD scters (originators, chartermeisters included) who
>> lurk in sct but do not respond and we have had very many good laughs.
>=================================
>Any idea why the OLD OLD SCTers are "lurking" and not "responding"?

simple,
they were the original scters, cant let the old habit die offf.
they read the junks or skim through
had some good laughs at some more junks
some get old, find the language used too modern for them
some dont like putting new wines into old goaty bags.
they do feel for the downgrading of standards of sct
but that is life
compare the old bbc news to today's
the reading is atocious
the idiom is idiotic
the subtelety and humour is no more there but replaced by tortortured
pronunciations.
we all agreed that times have changed, so have ALL the newsgroups.
so we are not the only "bad" guys.


>About what exactly are you laughing?
>Laughing at the sewer-situation of SCT?
>Or laughing at the attempts of some here to obtain a decent on topic forum
they feel for the good guys trying to steer the ship back but is a
herculean task given the politico social sitituations are now different.
>to discuss about a country they love?
yes
>Or laughing as the old guys who retired and see the Company staff struggling
>to keep it afloat?
yes and no
some just flow with the tides
some just stand around the sea of condoms of junks.
>In all 3 cases, allow me to be a bit sarcastic at you, old guys. You lost
>the flame, the will, something like that. Well, let them enjoy their
>retirement. They have done their share, thanks to them.
yes, you are right,
you are young, healthy hearty and adventourous
the old guys cant take your type of strains. ;-)
some take up viking sailing !!!!!!!!!!!
>
>Now, pluto, what do you have against mildly moderated NG? It seems that the
>simple reading of the word "moderated" makes you angry or something. Your
>reply to me includes:
>- A big misunderstanding (I never mentioned any already created SCT
>moderated??? I participate to moderated NG, but on other topics, not
>Thailand)

moderation alludes to a modicum of censorship
do you want to go back to the spannish inquisition?
of burn the printing press?

>- A misquote (Khun Nick figures, not mine)
>- A sarcasm (How many posts I already trashed)
>Is this another spam, somebody stealing pluto ID or?

no , it is i , pluto speaking
so far none has impersonate me , thanks to all for thy mercy

>Kindly let me know
>Cheers
>Daniel
>




cheers
pluto
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: tmo; is pedophilia off topic in sct?
    ... > how many posts have you censored, ... I wish to post in a mildly moderated SCT, I don't wish to be a moderator ... Laughing at the sewer-situation of SCT? ...
    (soc.culture.thai)
  • Answering "who are you?"
    ... > this forum except that the focus must be Islam. ... the moderator on duty at the moment. ... that you are ignored and your posts unanswered. ... I add 'posting privately" below my signature when I'm responding ...
    (soc.religion.islam)
  • Re: Bush nominates homophobe for surgeon general
    ... your posts so that you can run away from facing your own words. ... Moderator to allow 'X-No-Archive' (which his moderation software ... to your own credibility by refusing to face the original context. ... they do not account for it. ...
    (soc.religion.christian)
  • Re: Copy of PJRs Farewell Address to SMM
    ... My experience of other people's expectations is different from ... I've happily approved many of your posts in which you've ... feminists and he was doing so for a valid and logical reason. ... Thank you for proving you never should have been a moderator of this ...
    (soc.men)
  • Re: Its not dead yet
    ... I don't think that I ever claimed that your objections were not reasonable. ... was wrong about PJR. ... in any way falling short in his duties as a moderator. ... The average is about 8 posts per day. ...
    (soc.men)