Re: ARE THESE SPAM POSTED?

"Thomas 'tmo' Endt" <nutznetz0211@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dbt005$vf6$1@xxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| "Chabon 19" <chabon19@xxxxxxxxx> schrieb
| > One problem is, even if this guy is shot down with that address - he
| > will simply buy another net provider card and assume another identity,
| > and the whole game starts anew.
|
| ACK

ACK, and welcome as a priviledged member of my massmailer.

| > Best is as Daniel says:SKIP those mails and try to find the gems that
| > are still coming, one day those 3 guys must be tired.
|
| NACK

Up to you.
I will have more fun anyway.

| This is USENET.

Exactly.
And I can use it for the purposes it was meant created, or I can use it to
harras other people and their family as Deckard, Taking the Piss or
verifiable_truth are doing.
Read the charter of Usenet, and come back after that.
In fact, these 3 musqueteers and other SCT'rs are also spamming as the rules
about X-Abuse says: "anyone who treats another poster (butting his wires or
dumping a truck of *** in his front yard) is clearly intimidating that
person and his family and create a criminal offense".

| The name says it: when it started the intention was to provide something
| useful to people all over the world.

Making useless jokes at nausea about anybody in a newsgroup about thailand
is what UseNet was meant to?
Accusing people at nausea (Sandy Cruden as a bookish Aussie, Daniel as a
collaborator, Nick as a collaborator, Chabbon having an agenda, etc...) in a
forum about culture is what Usenet was meant to?
Seems to me that you haven't read the charts of Usenet.

| One dumbass thinks this is a
| playground, but it's definetely NOT.

Well, you are wrong in this.
As SCT is not moderated, I can post everything I want like others are
posting what they want.
Learn to live with that or QUIT Usenet altogether.

| This is NOT the place to fight his
| personal battles.

If I'm attacked or any member of my family, I can do what I want.
Off course, you are free to sue me.
In fact, I would be pleased if you do so.

| By aggressively posting hundreds of faked postings with
| no useful content, he clearly shows that he has not understood the sense
of
| the medium "usenet" or internet at all.

Seems to me that you haven't read the charters of Usenet at all.
Crawl back under your stone and start reading the charters of Usenet.

| His behaviour shows no respect of
| other people trying to communicate with each other through this newsgroup.

Neither does the 3 musqueteers.
Did I read a complaint of you about these?
No?

The ***-up and be proud too be a privilidged member of my massmailer.

| What would you do if someone filled your postbox (the one in real life)
| with piles of bull***?

That's exactly what is happening with posters on newsgroups.
Their postbox becomes filled with all kind of spamming emails.
Off course, if you dont want to receive further spam in your inbox, you can
send them a complaint.
So, what is the difference?

| Would you accept it without complaint?

Do you send a complaint to everyone that is sending soam to your inbox?
Good luck.
You must spend your life behind the keyboard.

| Imagine the serious posters of this newsgroup sitting together in a bar,
| having a few drinks and talking about the topic of this newsgroup: Thai
| Culture. What if one poster was screaming and shouting and disturbing the
| others talks, splashing beer over everyone who doesn't hide under the
| table? Would you accept it without complaint?

Imagine the serious posters of this newsgroup (which ones?) sitting together
in a bar, having a few drinks and talking about tasteless jokes about the
Aussies, other posters, posters who didn't agree with their views and got
stamped as collaborators.
What if these posters started to splash beer and treat the others with
dumping *** on their table?
Would you accept it without complaint?
Seems to me that you are bullshitting form your neck, Thomas.
Better quit SCT altogether and join another forum.
A moderated one.

| I would ask the bartender to get this guy removed and banned until he gets
| some brain and learns how to behave like a decent human.

I dont ask the bartender or anybody to clean the *** up for me, like most
of the SCT'rs.
I would clean-up the bullshitters by myself like I'm doing tight now.
Off course, only real men with balls can do that.
Not guys who are BIG behind their keyboard but *** in their paints when
they have to do something for real.
People like Thomas.

| The only right thing to do is to report this unacceptable violent
behaviour
| to his news-provider.

Off couse, you can do that.
Drawback is that as soon as you send a report to my news-provider, I get
another one.
By doing this, you make life difficult for other SCT'rs, as they willl need
to change their killfile again and YOU put them to needless work.
So, in fact, the real spamer who is making life difficult to other SCT'rs is
YOU, Thomas.

| Just take a look at the headers of his postings, copy & paste them and
| complain about him.

For what?
Most sct'rs know already that as soon as they report me to my news-provider,
I get another card and start all over again.
WITH them as a new member in my massmailer.
Most SCT'rs knows that it is better for all not ot interfere and simply put
me in their killfile.

| His present news-provider is news.sunsite.dk, the email-adress to file
| comlaints is staff@xxxxxxxxxx
| (may change, so always take a lok at the headers).

I have about 1,200 FREE newsproviders, most of them without listening to
stupid complaints.
So, "lok" at the headers.

bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah

Get a real life, Thomas.

| cu, tmo
|


.