Re: Many rocks can be tested to see its age.
- From: souldust <me@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:45:28 +0800
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:04:58 -0700 (PDT), Frankie Lee
<leeahkwee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Scientists of today can gather many rocks to test and assertain its
age.Now,all those rocks can be tested and proves conclusively that it
is relatively young and perhaps less than 6000 years old.
Now,if those rocks which were tested prove to be less than 6000 years
old,do we meant to show conclusively that our earth is young because
science told us so?
Of course not.But why?There is this thing known as "wisdom".It is the
selection and choosing according to our whimsical demands,whether it
is approriate or non-approriate,and there is also a long lists of
stringent criterias which would make a lifetime to gore over the
correct procedures manual.
Scientists of our day are in dispute over the way Patterson's tested
the meteorite,and eversince it proclaimed our earth to be 4.5 billion
of years,just based on that test,...who has the wisdom to see its
flawed test?
Young earth creationists,with many outstanding scientists, have proven
that our earth is less than 10000 years old,written in the science
journal remains undisputed.However,Liberal medias in USA used
Ridicules and the power of propagandas to talk down their scientific
facts and science journals.
You cannot win an arguments by ridicules and talk down,for that kind
of talk only persuade simpletons like Wusong and Alex to believe.There
needs to have wisdom and the ability to distinguish which is
which,separating the lies from truths.
Now,we saw the Brazilian junk leader using his fertile imagination to
describe the habit and lifestyles by simple looking at the bone,if I
am kind enough I would say that there is insufficent data fro him to
make such conjectures.To be crude,he is known to be a fraud and a junk
archealogist.There is no way he could make guessworks and analysis to
the habit of animals million of years apart.
I will assert,if millions of years age can be attributed to that
bones,may I say bacteria would have eaten it all up,and it should be
dusts and ashes by now..or not even ashes to be seen or felt!
Which refrigerator could preserved such state of the bone to its
present condition?
Buried any animal you want,and try to dig it our say,1000 years.What
would u see?
10000 years?A million?It would be a miracle if you can see a tiny
bone,not to mention a large one.
IT IS SCIENCE WHICH LED US TO UNDERSTAND THAT SUCH METHOD OF
DETERMINATION OF AGE IS SHEER IMPOSSIBLE.
Today,Evolutionists offered their studies like in an enclosed
atmosphere,leaving no room for any scientists to examine their
claims.They have a monopoly to the Press,and no other peer reviews is
allowed,but only one way straight talk from them,and it reminds me how
Communists did that through propagandas in those days,and since it is
their propagandas,10 out of 10,we can surmise,it is all lies and
nonsense,no worthiness and credibility at all.
You are not very bright.
.
- References:
- Many rocks can be tested to see its age.
- From: Frankie Lee
- Many rocks can be tested to see its age.
- Prev by Date: Re: Now the no-fly zone in force in Libya....France wanted to invade with ground troops...the USA wanted out...German wanted out
- Next by Date: pap is really scare
- Previous by thread: Re: Many rocks can be tested to see its age.
- Next by thread: Re: Many rocks can be tested to see its age.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
