Re: Why it is wrong to acquired land with compensation

You continue to be in hallucination. The government has been compensating
according to market rate when land or buildings are acquired for many years. The
only thing that people are not happy is they don't like to be uprooted from
their familiar environment. You continue to discredit Singapore without checking
the truth but shamelessly calling yourself "truth" ! You are coward and have no
creditability !


"truth" <truth@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:fX77k.13205$IK1.1671@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
How many Singaporeans are aware that in Singapore the pap
government can compulsorily acquired your land for road
works and not pay you any compensation. Not even a dollar.
Many may think this is ridiculous. I agree with you. But it
is true. Now I am going to argue why it is wrong of the pap
government to enact such an outrageously unfair law. There are
many unfair and outrageous laws enacted by the Leegime, this
is only one.

1. Acquiring another person's property without fair compensation
is against Natural Law. It is against the human rights of a citizen
to secure ownership of his property.

2. I know the pap government used the argument that land for
building roads are for the whole nation's benefits as justification for
not paying anything for compulsory acquisition of land for road
building. This argument is flawed. We know that the pap
government collected much more from the motorists than they spend
on road works. So roads in Singapore is a revenue generating
assets. So if the government is acquiring land to add to their revenue
generating assets, then they have to pay for these lands. When
private developers bid for government land, they paid for all the land
including those that have to be set aside for roads. So on principle of
basic equity, this action of the pap government has failed.

So the right thing for the pap government to do now is to abolish
this unfair and unjust law which give them the power to acquire land
for free even if it is for road building. Stop cheating Singaporeans.





.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Property rights nutjobs
    ... The Flip Side of Takings ... If the public were compensated for the increase in land value that results from ... arguing that compensating the victims of government action will cost ... courts interpreted those words to mean that compensation was due only if the ...
    (sci.econ)
  • Royal Wealth (continued)
    ... The Crown Property Bureau and How it Got That Way: ... The history of the land owned by the Thai monarchy, ... The government funds flowing into the PPB increased to about 15 percent of state ... In bargaining over his diminished role, King ...
    (soc.culture.malaysia)
  • Re: Economic Rent As Sum of Externalities
    ... Somehow I think the land ownership people ... a society or for the society as a whole? ... as the politicians will effectively be the private owners. ... I understand your disillusionment with government, ...
    (sci.econ)
  • LVT, more arguments against---again
    ... would be reasonable not to tax land, since there was no rent to tax. ... land is never absolute---and that includes the right of government to levy ... compensation. ...
    (sci.econ)
  • PRACTICAL POLITICS No.167
    ... PRACTICAL POLITICS July 2008 Issue No.167 ... "Last month's General Election changed the Government, ... public collection of the location value of land, ... economy will continue to flounder. ...
    (uk.politics.economics)