Re: Listen to the specialists like those in pap government at ur own risks
- From: "." <.@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:59:24 +0800
If you have attended ITE you would be better off!!!!!!!
"truth" <truth@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:di1lj.5653$421.682@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mrwangsaysso.blogspot.com/go
Jan 21, 2008
The Modern Risks of Information and Advice
In my earlier post, I wrote about the school principal who had strongly
urged her Secondary 5 students to give up studying for their O-levels and
to the ITE instead. This incident reminded of Freakonomics, a verycomplex,
interesting book that I had read some time ago.
Here's the relevant point from Freakonomics. As society grows more
more and more specialists evolve. Doctors, lawyers, financial advisers,or
property agents, journalists, religious leaders and car salesmen - all of
them are specialists of a different kind.
The individual cannot possibly be an expert in every field relevant to his
life. So he must often rely on advice from different specialists. For
example, if he is ill, he will consult a doctor. If he wants to buy a car
sell an apartment, he will talk to a car salesman or a property agent.therefore
The Freakonomics authors warn us that very often, the specialist's
self-interest is not fully aligned with the self-interest of the person
seeking information or advice. In other words, it often does not serve the
specialist to tell you everything that you should know.
For example, it may take too much time for the specialist to tell you
everything you should know, and there is no reward for doing so -
he won't.his
Or the specialist might deliberately withhold certain information about
product / service, because if you knew all its flaws, limitations orof
disadvantages, you might not want his product / service any more.
Or he may deliberately slant or angle his advice in certain ways, so that
you will be inclined to make a decision that serves his own self-interest.
And there is usually no equal footing, because the specialist, by virtue
being a specialist, already knows more than you. He holds the edge.within
Let's now consider our education system. Socially, we are conditioned to
think of education as a noble thing, and of educators as noble people.
Certainly this view has some validity - some people would say, a lot of
validity.
But at the same time, we must realise that there are different actors
the school system. Different actors means different self-interests, andthat
means the Freakonomics info/advice problem must arise again.a
What's good for the Ministry of Education is not necessarily good for the
principal. What's good for the principal is not necessarily good for the
teachers. What's good for the teachers is not necessarily good for the
students.
And what's good for the students may not necessarily be good for the
teachers, principal or the Ministry of Education.
(Minor digression - here is a brief account of how I, as a student, went
against the government's then-prevailing career advice for young
Singaporeans. I thereby became quite rich and successful).
It is very good for the principal, if the school achieves a high overall
pass score. An ambitious principal may well aim to achieve, say, a 98% or
100% pass score. It is conceivable that such an ambition may heavily shape
principal's advice to the students or the way the principal runs theschool.
knowledge
For example, the principal may discourage students from exploring
outside the formal school syllabus (such extra learning may be good forthe
students, but will not help the overall pass scores).pursue
Or the principal may prevent the students from taking subjects which the
students are interested in, but which are considered harder to pass (for
example, Further Maths, or Art, or Literature).
Or the principal may seek ways to put extreme pressure on the students to
work as hard as possible, such that a few of the less-resilient students
will inevitably suffer severe stress.
Or the principal may advise the weak students to leave the school and
other options elsewhere (if these students stay, and fail their exams,then
the overall pass scores would be damaged).not
And the students may never realise that their education is being shaped,
by considerations of what is good for them, but of what is good for theirthe
principal.
The Freakonomics authors do not say, of course, that in every case,
specialists are out to hurt the advisee's position. In many situations,
interests of the advisor and the advisee could be well-aligned - thismeans
that the advisor has a strong incentive to be genuinely helpful.reasons
What Freakonomics does warn us is that when we receive any specialist
advice, we should pause to ask ourselves - what are all the possible
why the specialist is telling us what the specialist is telling us?man
Final food for thought. Here's that Bertrand Russell quote again:
"Passive acceptance of the teacher's wisdom is easy to most boys and
girls. It involves no effort of independent thought, and seems rational
because the teacher knows more than his pupils; it is moreover the way to
win the favour of the teacher unless he is a very exceptional man. Yet the
habit of passive acceptance is a disastrous one in later life. It causes
to seek and to accept a leader, and to accept as a leader whoever is
established in that position." - Bertrand Russell.
So beware of the specialists in your life, whoever they may be.
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Singapore is a paradoxical society
- Next by Date: Re: Singapore is a paradoxical society
- Previous by thread: Listen to the specialists like those in pap government at ur own risks
- Next by thread: Moneytize your website, blogs easily by putting 5 second Audio Ads
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|