Re: Newater petition
- From: "Pangkor" <Daqtaoge@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 4 Aug 2006 07:22:26 -0700
The answer to that is not in the numbers alone. It is in the quality of
what it is. Some things will accumulate in the body. Some things will
not. What do you think of the unkown substances? Hide it under the
carpet and assume it is imaginary. Grow up and look after yourself
first.
- wrote:
Mr. Ventura tested and show proof that TDS is 50 to 70 ppm
or 0.0005 to 0.0007 % and not YOUR IMAGINATION OF 3 %.
WHAT HAVE GOT TO SAID TO THAT. I KNOW YOU WILL IGNORE IT.
"Ventura" <someone@somewhere> wrote in message
news:44d34d16$0$17941$892e7fe2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your 3% TDS is way too high even if it is not Newater. I did somemeasurement with a hand-held
(pangsai-meter) - the reading ranged from 50 to 70 ppm (part per million)TDS.
"Pangkor" <Daqtaoge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1154700266.993236.291990@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Someone who has no long term proof asking for proof. Your guess is assuppose
good as mine. The truth is in the future.
- wrote:
Show proof, don't keep imagining
trouble you don't know what you
are talking about.
WAKE UP OTHERWISE PEOPLE WILL
ATTEND YOUR WAKE SOON.
"Pangkor" <Daqtaoge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1154696804.600853.271860@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- wrote:
TDS is Total Dissolve Solids,
First do a experiment with your distilled water
measure 97 cc of distilled water
add 3 gram of table salt, stir until all the salt
dissolves, drink some and compare taste with pipe
water. You will realise that you are talking nonsense( I am not sure
if our SEA WATER have 3 % TDS)
that the TDS is 3%. Singapore's water follows WHO closely, in fact
I'm not sure what you are trying to imply here, but what do you
thethe long term effect of drinking an unkown substance might be?
tighter. It is just not possible that drinking water have 3% TDS.
Why is it not possible? It is definitely possible.
You want to know what is in our water do a search, I amThe search say that the 3% TDS is unkown substance which reflects on
not your Manufacturer of DISTILLERs.
the sewage source which can be anything that goes into the sewage
system, which is not likely to be healthy.
"Pangkor" <Daqtaoge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1154694382.361096.59800@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- wrote:
Mr. Pangkor, you talk with twisted tongue, you put
up a STATEMENT of FACT, 97 parts water 3 Parts BORON
you then say you did not said it when challenged, now you change
Let me state that Boron is not the only thing that is possible in
you3% TDS. Happy? Could you let me know what is in the 3% TDS since
youclearly want all of us to consume it. If you don't know, are you
justified in your beliefs, beyond just trusting the government who
trusts your public opinion supports it.
again. A statement of FACT is not an opinion. How can people
trust what you said, so far you show no proof of Newater, being
bad for health, you only bring up what your GODFATHER from
Australia, tell s you.You refuse to sent Newater to be tested,
think
It is you rather, who should test the 3% TDS fastidiously.
talk BORON which turn out to be a food supplement.
BORON, I suggest you further your studies on it, before making a
further fool of yourself.
Now your boss (DISTILLER MANUFACTER) 3% TDS,
They are not my bosses. They only supply something I use which I
tois good for you, your health, if you use it correctly.
I wonder if you know what it stands for.Please talk on something
you know or at lease understand, don't be a parrot.
I fully understand. Please, Singapore is a psychology subject as
onhow
to convince people to accept recycled water. There are web-pages
advocatethis.
Now you want people to vote for WP,
How can WP solve a heath problem if there is one, please
explain?
WP may not be able to solve it. They may be worse, because of the
quality of the science/scientists they have. But they did not
theyNewater. it is not their idea. And because it is not their idea,
again.wrong.will not rise up to defend it, if it is wrong, or is turning out
droppingThere is a time-line for long term effects to show.
http://www.gopetition.com/online/9264.html
"Pangkor" <Daqtaoge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1154651178.061438.317040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Here's one of the many reasons why.
The 3% TDS.
If it is cumulative, then if we have the likes of mercury,
surprising,down dead like after exercising in a gym is really not that
and more may come.
- wrote:
Only Pangkor is against it without knowing why, except
that Aussie are against it. Time for him to pray Aussies
news:44d2361d$0$17963$892e7fe2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Ventura" <someone@somewhere> wrote in message
loveSingaporeans are so used to recycled (pangsai) water. I
news:1154622607.581217.293070@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxit
too.
What
about you?...........;);)
"Pangkor" <Daqtaoge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
http://www.gopetition.com/online/9264.html
.
- References:
- Newater petition
- From: Pangkor
- Re: Newater petition
- From: Ventura
- Re: Newater petition
- From: -
- Re: Newater petition
- From: Pangkor
- Re: Newater petition
- From: -
- Re: Newater petition
- From: Pangkor
- Re: Newater petition
- From: -
- Re: Newater petition
- From: Pangkor
- Re: Newater petition
- From: -
- Re: Newater petition
- From: Pangkor
- Re: Newater petition
- From: -
- Newater petition
- Prev by Date: Re: A photo of a Minimata Victim
- Next by Date: Re: Newater petition
- Previous by thread: Re: Newater petition
- Next by thread: Re: Newater petition
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|