Re: Sand casino
- From: lobert 罗伯 <lobert@..>
- Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 11:47:47 +0800
There is more advantage to have a casino then the disadvantage. Our Govt is make the right decision. SHowever, Singapore will be a much better place now if this decision is made 10 years ago.
George Soros wrote:
External fund improves exchange rate of S$ & our reserves....
Also its added money supply will increase related velocities.
On 5 Jun 2006 19:32:31 -0700, "achtung" <konon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
CPF money is not for casino investment
Polar Bear wrote:I understand that one of the condition in granting the license is they must obtain
external funding. There is so much fund stahsed in the Singapore financial sector.
Why is it that Singapore should not fund this "sure win" investment?
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sand casino
- From: George Soros
- Re: Sand casino
- From: "lobert 罗伯 (luo bo)"
- Re: Sand casino
- From: ardeedee
- Re: Sand casino
- References:
- Sand casino
- From: Polar Bear
- Re: Sand casino
- From: achtung
- Re: Sand casino
- From: George Soros
- Sand casino
- Prev by Date: Re: first man in Southeast Asia to conquer Mount Everest twice.
- Next by Date: Re: HOUGANG & POTONG PASIR PROVES PAP STOLE MANDATE!
- Previous by thread: Re: Sand casino
- Next by thread: Re: Sand casino
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|