Re: Unfair media coverage
- From: "ardeedee" <ardeedee1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 03:36:09 +0800
Eventually it is the count of the votes that is decisive.
"truth" <truth@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:wJ45g.19753$vy1.14756@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The media has failed miserably in presenting a fair
and neutral converage of this GE. This is not new as
they have been doing it all these years under Harry's
instructions. Harry is dictating to the editors what
to publish and what not to publish.
That they continue to pursue this lopsided coverage of
the GE, by giving preferential and extra large coverage
of the pap and some rather unfair treatment of the
opposition, will not put Singapore in a good position
in the eyes of the world. In these age when people all
over the world demand fairness and openness, the Singapore pap
government by controlling the media is going against
the tide.
This is why the pap government is so unwilling to allow
neutral international observer to witness the Singapore
GE. I have no doubt that neutral international observers
would have concluded that the Singapore GE is unfair due
to 1. Bias media and disproportionate coverage. 2. Use of
state resources by the pap for their party purposes. 3. Bias
and unfair state laws and institutions against the opposition.
.
- References:
- Unfair media coverage
- From: truth
- Unfair media coverage
- Prev by Date: Re: Was it Honest Mistakes ?
- Next by Date: Re: To vote for the opposition is to vote for freedom
- Previous by thread: Unfair media coverage
- Next by thread: Are there energy conservation measures?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
