Re: DP World pulls out of US ports, rescuing Bush from firestorm
- From: "....lobert...." <lobert@..>
- Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 12:56:55 +0800
arsedeedee just wanted to "po lampa" of DP world.
boraha wrote:
Who do you think new buyer US entity will sell to after it dies down?. It is.
unlikely they will do anything at all.
"ardeedee" <ardeedee1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:44119605$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
How naive Americans are - DP World will sell the six US Ports to a USentityand when everything dies down they will buy out the entity.operations
"kilometric" <katami@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:durdac$2jh$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://sg.news.yahoo.com/060309/1/3z9jh.html
A Dubai government-owned company said it will sell its US portinthea move that spared President George W. Bush a showdown with Congress.Republicans
Dubai Ports World (DP World) made the announcement after leadingtold Bush that Congress would block the takeover.
"Because of the strong relations between the United Arab Emirates andwasUnited States and to preserve that relationship, DP World has decided toUnited
transfer fully the US operations of P and O Ports North America to a
States entity," said a company statement read by Republican Senator Johnto
Warner.
"This decision is based on an understanding that DP World will have timeeffect the transfer in an orderly fashion and that DP World will notsuffereconomic loss," the statement said."to
The company said it was looking forward to working with the US Treasuryimplement that decision."said:
The White House signaled relief at the move.
Asked if the sale announced by DP World would end the rift with the
Republican-controlled Congress, White House spokesman Scott McClellan
"I think so."on
The divestment "provides a way forward and allows us to continue workingother important priorities," he said.
McClellan said the White House had nothing to do with the sale. "Thislegislationtheir decision," he said.
Details of the transfer were not immediately disclosed.
Warner read the company statement as the Senate began debatingcontrolon blocking the deal, which would have given DP World operationalofUSports in Baltimore, New York, Miami, New Jersey, New Orleans and
Philadelphia.
DP World said that the UAE prime minister, Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid
al-Maktoum, had advised the company that the assets disposal was "the
appropriate course to take" in the interest of the UAE and the US.
The company previously had agreed to a new 45-day review of the deal byUSauthorities.6.9
The announcement was made as DP World earlier said it had completed thebillion dollar takeover of British firm Peninsular and Oriental Steamfierce
Navigation Company (P and O).
Before the statement was issued it became clear the Senate would backand widespread Republican and Democratic opposition to the deal, overDP
security concerns.
The White House had threatened to veto any legislation that stopped the
deal. But the administration's hand was forced after the House of
Representatives Appropriations Committee voted 62-2 Wednesday to prevent
World from acquiring control of the port operations.president
Commentators warned the affair risked hurting US businesses overseas,
especially in the Middle East.
Speaking on the CNBC network, Hussein Ibish of the Foundation for
Arab-American Leadership said the UAE government and DP World had been
forced to submit to "demagogues and populists".
"We do have a concern about the potential for retaliation in the trade
space," Bruce Josten, the US Chamber of Commerce's executive vice
for government affairs, told AFP.
Stressing that 30 percent of the US economy is driven by international
trade, he said: "The concern from where I sit is glaringly obvious: the
buton a worldwide basis has the most to lose.
"Retaliation precipitated by Congress will not only harm US employersgovernmentsemployees as well. If we start losing markets, you're going to see
shuttering of plants. People are going to lose their jobs."
Boeing Co. is one of the US companies with most to lose shouldforin the Middle East react adversely to the DP World imbroglio.billion
In November, the aviation giant won a mammoth order worth nearly 10dollars from the UAE's flagship airline Emirates for 42 777 long-haulUAE,
aircraft.
Last year US companies exported goods worth 8.5 billion dollars to themaking the small country of 2.5 million people a bigger export markettothe United States than India or Spain.
But Representative Peter King, one of the Republican lawmakers who wentgovernmentsee Bush on Thursday, rejected the concerns.
King highlighted the UAE's previous recognition of the TalibaninBritishAfghanistan and insisted there was a difference between allowing astance,company and a UAE company to control US ports.perspectives,"
"We have to deal with different countries based on differenthe said.
US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales defended the administration'stryingcalling the United Arab Emirates a "terrific ally" that had provided theUSmilitary access to its airfields and ports.
He cited the case of Richard Reid, a British national convicted oftomeanbomb a US airline with explosives hidden in his shoes. "That doesn'tsaidthat we're not going to do business with British companies," Gonzalesopposein an interview on CNN.
In Wednesday's House committee vote, Republicans voted en masse toRepublicansthe deal, citing national security concerns over an Arab companycontrollingkey US facilities.
With midterm congressional elections looming in November, manyandfear they are losing their advantage over opposition Democrats on theissueof national security.the
The company's announcement nevertheless failed to satisfy Democrats, who
said security at US ports remained in jeopardy.
Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer, a prominent deal critic, said despite"scent of victory," the Dubai company's move would have to be closely
examined.
"The devil is in the details," he said.
In a related development Time magazine said on its website another
Dubai-owned company has since January provided services in 12 US ports
engagesto the US Navy.to
The British company Inchcape Shipping Services (ISS) was sold in Januarya "Dubai government investment vehicle for 285 million dollars," Timesaid.ISS has more than 200 offices around the world, including more than adozenUS port cities including Houston, Miami and New Orleans, where itinfuel"arranging pilots, tugs, linesmen and stevedores, among other things,"saidthe magazine.making
The US Navy in June of last year signed a 50 million dollar contractISS its "Husbanding Agent for vessels in most Southwest Asia ports,unclassified
including those in the Middle East," said Time quoting from an
Navy logistics manual.
As husbanding agent, ISS is responsible for arranging everything fromprotection."to spare parts to fresh vegetables for vessels at ports of call.
"More critically," said Time.com, "they often provide security, like
erecting concrete barriers and what the military calls force
aThe company also knows ships' schedules weeks in advance.
An ISS spokesman contacted by Time refused to comment on the report, butstatement issued by the company said ISS had undergone rigorous externaladding
security checks and has comprehensive internal policies on security,
that all port staff are fully vetted and undergo a background check.
The Washington Post said Friday the ISS was purchased by a Dubai company
whose executive, Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, also heads DP World
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- DP World pulls out of US ports, rescuing Bush from firestorm
- From: kilometric
- Re: DP World pulls out of US ports, rescuing Bush from firestorm
- From: ardeedee
- DP World pulls out of US ports, rescuing Bush from firestorm
- Prev by Date: Re: LTA. So who the F is responsible after spending $36mil?
- Next by Date: Re: What if Singapore had no Lee Kuan Yew?
- Previous by thread: Re: DP World pulls out of US ports, rescuing Bush from firestorm
- Next by thread: Re: DP World pulls out of US ports, rescuing Bush from firestorm
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|