Re: raja dog, lai dog..hallelujah

At last, you wake up from the demise of your starhub servers.....;))

"ardeedee" <ardeedee1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:44042434$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Why his old *** let's him down more often?

"Ventura" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4403c188$0$7112$6d36acad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I think he acted "smartly" in case the old *** wanted to let off his
wrath on him. Old ***'s
temper never wanes with age.


"Zeitgeist" <zeitgeist@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:8be702t5gbqqlmd7iv043rsggo3m2bb8mp@xxxxxxxxxx
This posting must have been done by a trained lawyer now hiding in a
funkhole Downunder posting from a remailer sited in Tonga near Oz...

No brainer in guessing who this coward is nor his handle.

On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 01:16:09 +0100 (CET), Anonymous via the
Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Good to hear LKY dogs are dying one by one

Retired High Court judge Lai Kew Chai dies of cancer

Retired High Court Judge Lai Kew Chai has died at the age of 65.

The High Court said the former judge, who had suffered from
cancer, died at 11am on Monday.

The late Mr Lai had retired on February 7 this year.

He was appointed to the High Court in 1981. Then, he was just 40
years old, making him the youngest judge to be appointed to the
High Court.

Prior to this, he had been in private practice for 13 years, 10
of them as a partner at Lee & Lee, the legal firm he joined
after graduating from the University of Singapore.

In a career spanning 25 years on the Bench, he heard many high-
profile cases.

In the past year alone, these include the Huang Na murder trial
and the Court of Appeal hearing for Australian drug smuggler
Nguyen Tuong Van.

In the 1992 Pertamina corruption case, the late Mr Lai's
decision to allow the Indonesian petroluem giant's claims
against a former staff became a landmark decision in the
Commonwealth.

He had rejected an English legal authority on the law of
corruption which had been followed for over a century in England
and the Commonwealth.

Mr Lai also made many contributions to the legal scene, serving
as the Chairman of the Board of Legal Education from 1981 to
1993, and as Vice-President of the Law Society from 1979 to 1981.

He left behind his wife, Dorothy, and two children - Stanley,
37, and Amy, 33 - both of whom are lawyers, and two
granddaughters.

It is interesting to note that the PAP leaders? applications to strike
out my Defences were
originally fixed for hearing on 10th March 1997 before Justice Lai Kew
Chai. I made an
application to disqualify him from hearing the said applications
against me on the ground of
bias as (i) he was also one of the "early-bird buyers"like Lee Kuan
Yew and members of his
family of Hotel Properties Ltd?s (HPL) luxurious properties with huge
discounts, which was one
of the subject matters of those PAP leaders? claims before him; and
(ii) he was a close friend
of Lee Kuan Yew and his family. The court also fixed my application
for hearing before Justice
Lai Kew Chai himself on that same day in the morning. After lengthy
arguments between my
counsel, Mr J B Jeyaretnam, and the counsel for Lee Kuan Yew and the
other PAP leaders, which
lasted till late in the evening, he dismissed my application to
disqualify himself. At the same
time, he ordered Mr J B Jeyaretnam to be personally responsib
le to pay the legal costs of the p> arties and referred his conduct to
the Disciplinary Committee
of the Law Society for investigation. (This part of his order against
Mr Jeyaretnam personally
was thrown out by the Court of Appeal in November 1997.)

However, to save the situation from undesirable consequences, Justice
Lai disqualified himself
by his own conduct in that he dared not hear Lee Kuan Yew and the
other PAP leaders?
applications to strike out my Defences. Instead, immediately after
dismissing my application
that evening, he directed that the PAP leaders? applications be
transferred to another judge,
Justice Goh Joon Seng, for hearing that evening. Voluminous documents
must have to be rushed to
the courtroom of Justice Goh and placed before his desk like a hill.
By then it was already 7.30
pm in the evening. It is amazing to note that Justice Goh also
performed another judicial
miracle by being able to read and digest, within less than an hour,
voluminous documents
relating to 12 lawsuits and to make a decision there and then by
striking out my Defences, at
9.30 pm. that very same night.

In mid-March 1997, Lee Kuan Yew?s offensive statements as contained in
one of his affidavits
filed in court in which he described the Malaysian state of Johor as a
place "notorious for
shootings, muggings and car-jackings,"offended the people and the
government of Malaysia and
caused a very serious diplomatic row between Singapore and Malaysia.
Lee Kuan Yew had to
apologise twice to the people and government of Malaysia for that and
promised to apply to Court
to delete his offensive statements from the records of the Singapore
High Court in May 1997 when
the Court would sit for assessment of damages against me.

However, for reasons best known to himself, and to my and everybody?s
surprise, Lee Kuan Yew
submitted the application to Court on 24 April 1997 which came up for
hearing on 28 April 1997.
The presiding judge, Lai Kew Chai, acceded to his application, but
shockingly, blamed me for
drawing the attention of the Malaysians to Lee Kuan Yew?s offensive
statements and ordered me to
pay Lee Kuan Yew?s legal costs for the application without Lee Kuan
Yew even asking for it in
his application. Apparently, the judge was all out to please and
soothe the "Lord" of Singapore.
This order, once again, shook public confidence in the Singapore
judiciary.


*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from
http://www.SecureIX.com ***




*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
.

Quantcast