Re: 2006 General Erection.
- From: "....lobert...." <lobert@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:00:26 +0800
Bad boy wrote:
"Tweety" <birdman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:430leeF1ktaepU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxElection should go back to SRC. If there are not enough Malay and Indian MPs (says 15) in the parliament, use the NCMP method to fill up the vacancy. The Malay and Indian candiadtes with the highest percentage of votes will be made the NCMPs
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:08:10 +0800, "Bad boy" <badboy_sinland@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
They have real problems................. 1) problem of getting the chance to vote...to vote for someone to represent them in parliarment,.... to fight for their interests on their behalf in parliament......
Who is stopping you or anyone, it's the opposition fault....
The GOVERNMENT is stopping Singaporeans. They introduced the GRC scheme, .... to retain power without having to face the voters at GE. It is the fault of the government, for introducing this GRC scheme....(It is no fault of the other MPs...they did not have the power to stop the GRC scheme.) At the next GE, it is time to revise this scheme and let the voters choose their MPs....if Singaporeans choose PAP MPs so be it, I am not unhappy..... But, with this scheme, Singaporean DID NOT vote for the MPs in GRC ...They were NOT elected by the people...
2) They have problems with kicking out those MP who were not elected by them, ....those who are now in parliament WITHOUT getting their mandate to rule.....
What mandates?
The mandate from the people. In a democracy, the mandate to rule come from the citizens. Periodically, the government must go back to the people at GE, to ask for fresh mandate to rule. Those GRC MPs were NOT elected (voted in) by the people, .... they failed to get the mandate from Singaporeans.
3) They have problems with large GRCs...a scheme to get a majority in the past GEs, to declare victory on nomination day...WITHOUT having to face the voters,
The law stated the GRC watever size, location and so wats
the problems?
The LAW....???? This law is 'the' problem...this law is a scheme, to perpectuate PAP rule.... without having to face the voters.....this is against the principle of democracy!
It is time to revise the GRC scheme...to return the power to appoint the government to the people....the right to choose the MPs of their choice ....the power of giving the mandate to rule... to the winning party.
Is the ruling party afraid to face the voters ?... Surely, base on their current performance, they should have the confidence to face the voters !
4) They have problems getting back their sacred rights to choose their own MPs, to give mandate to the chosen ones to rule, ...GRC had robbed them of this sacred right.
GRC was enacted by Parliament..... If the opposition dun like it they should have......
The GRC was an act beyond the parlianmentary power given by the people. ...The people did NOT give parliament the power to enact laws, to rob Singaporean of their rights to choose their own MPs and to elect (vote) a government of thcir choice.
It is NOT the fault of the MPs of the other parties...This issue of GRC go beyond party politics. It is between the government and the people of Singapore... The government must not enact laws to perpectuate its rule....the government is required to get fresh mandate, periodically, from the people to rule Singapore. GRC is therefore against the principle of democracy..... it bypass the need for the government to face the voters.
Remember, ..."democracy is rule by the people for the people". MPs not chosen by the people is NOT rule by the people, it is ...rule by 'elites' without the mandate of the people.
If opposition cannot and will not contest the GRC's ...
I repeat,....GRC is beyond party politics....
You tok *** why don't you run, scare or no balls.
I am NOT interested in petty party politics. I am interested in seeing that our government is duely elected, and duly empowered by the people of Singapore to rule..... I am interested .....in excercising the right of the people in a democray. Do you have problem with that ?
Are you saying Singapore is NOT a democracy...the GE is a sham ? I certainly have different takes from you.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2006 General Erection.
- From: ardeedee
- Re: 2006 General Erection.
- References:
- Re: 2006 General Erection.
- From: wiseguy
- Re: 2006 General Erection.
- From: wiseguy
- Re: 2006 General Erection.
- From: Bad boy
- Re: 2006 General Erection.
- From: Bad boy
- Re: 2006 General Erection.
- Prev by Date: Re: Bubbly urinals an abnormalism?
- Next by Date: Re: Can honey cure colon cancer?
- Previous by thread: Re: 2006 General Erection.
- Next by thread: Re: 2006 General Erection.
- Index(es):