Re: Anglican bishops declare that Jesus is not God.

All religions have their share of controversies and Christianity is no

Some learned westerners like Bertrand Russell, even claim that Jesus is a
mythical figure and his arguments were not demolished during his life time.
These arguments can go on and on with no end.

Frogs in wells, like Freakie and his counterparts in other cults, will
continue to croak their own brand of snake oil. The common streak among them
is that they will NEVER answer your queries because they themselves are
ignorant of what they are parroting. They should learn to just pray to
their own deity and stop condemning others. Live and let live.

"H@slu" <§cullitt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> Anglican bishops declare that Jesus is not God
> The very first groups of Christians such as the Ebonites, the Cerinthians,
> the Basilidians, the Capocratians, and the Hypisistarians attest that
> Jesus
> is a mortal and not a god. The Arians, Paulicians and Goths also accepted
> Jesus as a prophet of God. Even in the modern age there are churches in
> Asia, in Africa, the Unitarian church, the Jehovah's witnesses, and even
> the
> majority of today's Anglican Bishops do not worship Jesus as God.
> In the British newspaper the "Daily News" 25/6/84 under the heading "Shock
> survey of Anglican Bishops" We read
> "More than half of England's Anglican Bishops say that Christians are not
> obliged to believe that Jesus Christ was God, according to a survey
> published today. The pole of 31 of England's 39 bishops shows that many of
> them think that Christ's miracles, the virgin birth and the resurrection
> might not have happened exactly as described in the Bible. Only 11 of the
> bishops insisted that Christians must regard Christ as both God and man,
> while 19 said it was sufficient to regard Jesus as 'God's supreme agent'"
> This is exactly what Jesus himself testified to in the Bible:
> "And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God,
> and
> Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent."
> John 17:3
> Astounding, isn't it? With every passing day, the most learned among the
> Christian community are slowly recognizing the truth. These are not
> "liberal" Christians or Muslims who issued this statement. These are the
> most learned and most highly esteemed men of the Anglican Church. These
> men
> have dedicated their whole lives to the study of the religion of Jesus,
> and
> their study has driven them to the truth. That Jesus was not God. That God
> is not a Trinity. And that the stories of the ministry of Jesus in the
> Bible
> have been extensively tampered with by the hands of mankind.
> The Church, as Heinz Zahrnt put it "put words into the mouth of Jesus
> which
> he never spoke and attributed actions to him which he never performed."
> One
> of those who has shown that most of what the church says about Jesus is
> baseless is Rudolph Augustein in his book "Jesus the Son of Man." Another
> very comprehensive study of this matter can be found in the book "The Myth
> of God Incarnate" which was written by seven theologian scholars in
> England
> in 1977 and edited by John Hick. Their conclusion in this matter is that
> Jesus was "a man approved by God, for a special role within the divine
> purpose, and..... the later conception of him as God incarnate ... is a
> mythological or poetic way of expressing his significance for us." See
> also
> John Mackinnon Robertson's "Christianity and Mythology" T.W Doane's "The
> Bible Myths and their Parallels in Other Religions" (A good summary of
> these
> studies is available in M.F. Ansarei, "Islam and Christianity in the
> Modern
> World").
> A University of Richmond professor, Dr. Robert Alley, after considerable
> research into newly found ancient documents concludes that
> "....The (Biblical) passages where Jesus talks about the Son of God are
> later additions.... what the church said about him. Such a claim of deity
> for himself would not have been consistent with his entire lifestyle as we
> can reconstruct. For the first three decades after Jesus' death
> Christianity
> continued as a sect within Judaism. The first three decades of the
> existence
> of the church were within the synagogue. That would have been beyond
> belief
> if they (the followers) had boldly proclaimed the deity of Jesus."
> Is there any confirmation of this in the Bible, yes! If we were to read
> the
> Bible we would find that long after the departure of Jesus, his faithful
> followers continued to "keep up their daily attendance at the Temple"
> (Acts
> 2:46) It would be beyond belief to imagine that had Jesus indeed preached
> to
> his apostles that he was God, and if Jesus had indeed commanded them to
> forsake the commandments, that they would then disregard all of this and
> continue to worship in a Jewish synagogue on a daily basis, let alone the
> great Temple itself. It is further beyond belief that the Jews of the
> Temple
> would stand idly by and allow them to do this if they were preaching the
> total cancellation of the law of Moses and that Jesus was God.
> Can any Trinitarian Christian, even in their wildest fantasies, imagine
> that
> the Jews in an orthodox Jewish synagogue would stand idly by while he took
> out his cross and prayed to Jesus in the midst of their synagogue and was
> publicly calling others to worship Jesus and forsake the commandments? How
> much more preposterous to imagine that they would have nothing to say to
> someone who did that in their most sacred of all synagogues, the Temple,
> on
> a daily basis yet. This is further evidence in that Jesus only called his
> followers to a continuation of the religion of Moses and not by any means
> to
> the total cancellation and destruction of that law.
> Lets read the following verses of the Bible that proves that God is God
> and
> Jesus is Jesus, both are distinct and never a part of one another:
> "Know therefore this day, and consider [it] in thine heart, that the LORD
> he
> [is] God in heaven above, and upon the earth beneath: [there is] none
> else."
> Deuteronomy 4:39.
> "Thou shalt have no other gods before me." Exodus 20:3
> "For thou shalt worship no other god: for the LORD, whose name [is]
> Jealous,
> [is] a jealous God:" Exodus 34:14
> "Ye [are] my witnesses, saith the LORD, and my servant whom I have chosen:
> that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I [am] he: before me
> there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me. I, [even] I,
> [am]
> the LORD; and beside me [there is] no savior." Isaiah 43:10-11.
> "Thus saith the LORD the King of Israel, and his redeemer the LORD of
> hosts;
> I [am] the first, and I [am] the last; and beside me [there is] no God."
> Isaiah 44:6
> "That they may know from the rising of the sun, and from the west, that
> [there is] none beside me. I [am] the LORD, and [there is] none else."
> Isaiah 45:6
> "For thus saith the LORD that created the heavens; God himself that formed
> the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in vain,
> he
> formed it to be inhabited: I [am] the LORD; and [there is] none else."
> Isaiah 45:18.
> "Look unto me, and be ye saved, all the ends of the earth: for I [am] God,
> and [there is] none else." Isaiah 45:22
> Now we should begin to ask ourselves: If there was no god before or after
> God Almighty, then how was Jesus "begotten" as a god? The answer is: he
> was
> not. He was a mortal man, not a god. We even have the testimony of the
> majority of today's Anglican Bishops in defense of this basic truth. If we
> want the testimony of a trustworthy witness then how much more trustworthy
> a
> witness shall we ever find than the majority of the most learned and
> respected conservative Christians of the Anglican Church?
> Only St Paul (Saul) preaches that Jesus is God and that God is a Trinity
> entity to those who do not know it's innermost details and the truth of
> the
> history of the Church as these men (Anglican bishops) have come to know
> it.
> A wake-up call to Frankie, to preach the TRUTH!