Re: not every Tom, Dick and Harry, can assume the position of the Presidency.
- From: "ardeedee" <ardeedee1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 17:29:27 +0800
You man you are against the present President being appointed?
"lobert" <lobert@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dehaa1$ipi$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> No, it's the three wise men in the PEC.
> Otherwise, you don't even have a chance to vote.
>
> Citizen wrote:
> > Well it for the people to decide to vote for him or not.
> >
> > "lobert" <lobert@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:deh3d8$ig7$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >>http://www.todayonline.com/articles/68430.asp
> >>
> >>Hot News // Wednesday, August 24, 2005
> >>
> >>"It would have appeared that I was beefing up my own eligibility. But
now
> >>that you ask me, I will say it: It is understandable why the eligibility
> >>criteria has been made so stringent. Because not every Tom, Dick and
> >>Harry, however well-intentioned, can assume the position of the
> >>Presidency."
> >>
> >>There is at least one Harry can !
> >
> >
> >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: not every Tom, Dick and Harry, can assume the position of the Presidency.
- Next by Date: Re: Malaysia fall to Myanmar again in the Asean U20 Youth Football Tournament
- Previous by thread: Re: not every Tom, Dick and Harry, can assume the position of the Presidency.
- Next by thread: Re: not every Tom, Dick and Harry, can assume the position of the Presidency.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|