Re: Ping the Yanks
- From: Cory Bhreckan <coryvreckan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:44:18 -0500
Charles Ellson wrote:
On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:12:31 -0500, S Viemeister
<firstname@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 3/2/2010 10:00 AM, conwaycaine wrote:Webster's ? That's a foreign wordbook innit ?"S Viemeister"<firstname@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wroteSee also <http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/arbiter>On 3/1/2010 10:32 AM, conwaycaine wrote:I'm not sure you are correct, Shiela.
And there you Brits stand, waving the Union Jack, and saying "We are theThat would be 'arbiters'.
sole arbitrators of what is and isn't good English"
But let me check my Webster's just to see.
Well, my heavens, it appears you ARE incorrect.
Score one for the left side of the pond then..............
Webster's Dictionary.
Main Entry: ar·bi·tra·tor
Pronunciation: \'är-b?-?tra-t?r\
Function: noun
Date: 15th century
: one that arbitrates : arbiter
The words are cousins, but they are used in slightly different ways.
The hell it is! It's from the good ole You Ess Ay.
--
"For the stronger we our houses do build,
The less chance we have of being killed." - William Topaz McGonagall
http://www.myspace.com/corryvreckan
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ping the Yanks
- From: conwaycaine
- Re: Ping the Yanks
- References:
- Re: Ping the Yanks
- From: Robert Peffers
- Re: Ping the Yanks
- From: conwaycaine
- Re: Ping the Yanks
- From: S Viemeister
- Re: Ping the Yanks
- From: conwaycaine
- Re: Ping the Yanks
- From: S Viemeister
- Re: Ping the Yanks
- From: Charles Ellson
- Re: Ping the Yanks
- Prev by Date: Re: Ping the Yanks
- Next by Date: Re: Ping the Yanks
- Previous by thread: Re: Ping the Yanks
- Next by thread: Re: Ping the Yanks
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|