Re: Turkey in Europe ?

On Apr 9, 9:54 am, "conwaycaine" <conwayca...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"The Phantom Piper" <ThePhantomPi...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:fb290d12-9928-434e-a8d1-df1937cf47e3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Apr 8, 7:25 am, "conwaycaine" <conwayca...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



If we must have a Pub administration from time to time,
let it be elected by the slimmest of majorities.

Or even by _No Majority At All_!

(Oh right, we tried that...)

Not Enthused,

The Phantom Piper

************

With the Supreme Court on your side, all things are possible.

Any SCOTUS was going to rule that way because .....wait for it...W
was elected under the existing election rules. Was there some shady
practices? I'd say so, but nothing illegal was done...or, to be fair,
could be proven.
To put it all in perspective, if the 2000 election was such a
travesty, why haven't the Dems worked to change the election laws?
Could it be that they figure it's as likely to fall their way next
time?
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Turkey in Europe ?
    ... let it be elected by the slimmest of majorities. ... The Phantom Piper ... was elected under the existing election rules. ...
    (soc.culture.scottish)
  • Re: Turkey in Europe ?
    ... the slimmest of majorities. ... his election WAS a mandate. ... Clinton didn't take care of his own? ...
    (soc.culture.scottish)
  • Re: Turkey in Europe ?
    ... was elected under the existing election rules. ... Was there some shady ...
    (soc.culture.scottish)
  • Re: Democracy is itself a good
    ... >> Of course we might also implement election rules that ... >> election and lacking that a moratorium on new legilation ... > And just who would command the armed forces until the next election cycle? ...
    (sci.econ)