Re: Obama -v- McCain debate....Obamaman won hands down


"Deirdre Sholto Douglas" <finch.enteract@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:48E365B4.BE24F9F9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Adam Whyte-Settlar wrote:

"Deirdre Sholto Douglas" <finch.enteract@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:48E0F42A.44CFFA7E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I killfiled him months ago. I am ignoring him

You are _not_ ignoring him...the bulk of the traffic these
days is _you_, trying to tell others to ignore Fred. The
obsession is _yours_.

He's laughing at you right now.

I doubt it...laughing at _you_ and your flailing perhaps,
but not me.

You don't have a clue who he is or what he is really like - obviously or
you
wouldn't be encouraging him.

I don't care who who anyone is or what they're really like...
this is USENET and prima facie is good enough for me.

What I see is Fred taunting you and you flailing about in-
effectually trying to get the upper hand..

Well that's news to me. I don't see anything brain-dead posts except for the
odd snipe that gets reposted which I slap down easily every time. I've never
known anyone quite so ignorant on every subject so it's not dificult.
I've never 'flailed around' on usenet in my life. As you well know I can
more than handle myself thank you.
And you willfully ignore the FACT that it is HE who is perpetually trying to
get MY attention, not the other way round. I've seen a hundred lame trolls
like him in scs and a lot of them post exactly the same old tired lame
insults. That's why I was pointing out that there is no point in reposting
his trolls of me - I havn't got time to reply to all of them. In fact I
havn't got time to reply to the interesting posts let alone his.

..fine, if that's
the game you want to play, then go play it...but trying
to suborn others into supporting your Lost Cause by
insisting they snub Fred at your behest Isn't On.

I'm requesting that you 'snub Fred' I was requesting politely that you don't
bother reposting his obsessive and repetative trolls aimed specifically at
me. I'm simply not interested. He has never posted anything remotely
original and most of his 'ripostes' are cut and paste jobs from other
posters as I and others have demonstrated.

But I'll stop slapping him down when he stops trolling me.

In other words, you have no self-control and are unable
to prevent yourself from rising to some very cheap and
stinky bait.

Oh it's cheap allright. But although I've no interest in his dozens of
futile attempts to troll me in general I have to admit I do enjoy ridiculing
him from time to time when I'm in the mood. Just not several times a day as,
unlike him, I don't have several hours per day to cut and paste insults or
those ridiculous "quotes" of his. Quotes that, incidentily, are
psuedo-random bot-generated by a piece of software that one can download
free.
How pathetic can he get.

In the end, it just leaves you, like a frog at-
tached to electrodes, jumping everytime he says "hop"...
I'm not sure that's something to be proud of, Adam, but
if it works for you, then go for it.

I don't think anyone here particularly cares if you wish
to take Fred on, however if past posts are any indication
of future ones, you run the very real risk of becoming
tedious and unreadable...artful putdowns don't seem to
be your forte

I am a passed master at artful putdowns - in fact I'm famous for it in real
life as well as all over usenet - but the recipient has to be worthy of the
effort. Brain-dead is only worthy of a swift traumatic slap round the head
in passing when I happen to come accross one of his tedious plaigiarised
trolls that has been regurgitated by ladies who have yet to discover what a
sleazy mysoginist slimeball he truly is.


and readers tend to tire of the repetitive
blunt trauma flames quickly.

Obviously it's your choice, my sense of the situation is
that continuing in the vein you've chosen is doing more
damage to youself than to Fred. Is that really what you
want?

Ah - that's just Our Deirdre of the Immaculate Perception speaking isn't it.
Not everyone sees brain-dead the way you do.
I will continue to slap the idiot any time I feel like amusing myself - he
deserves it.
I've told you before - no-one is forcing you to open my posts and, judging
from your comments, you won't be missing much in the way of anything you
might find entertaining anyway.
Am I bovvered?



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: [SLRN] using mixmaster to anonymize posting with slrn
    ... The only people that are hunting them are trolls that can't ... people on the Usenet. ... I read articles with subject headers that interest ... and someone who posts using a single word common ...
    (news.software.readers)
  • Re: LymeNUT Razzias: maybe its me---mcpucho
    ... > Frequent Contributor ... > Posts: 504 ... They can just go somewhere else to play them, for Trolls are ... > hmmmm - I'm not a troll but I have a hotmail address that I've had since ...
    (sci.med.diseases.lyme)
  • Re: Rising dump
    ... Gods help ... I find your posts delightful, almost every one has something within it ... that your obsession is uncontrollable, ... spatter pee-pee as much as you like, ...
    (misc.writing)
  • Re: Hello
    ... But what people perceive, is you being as nasty as the other nasty people, ... refusal of some to see the nastiness in their friends. ... newsgroup - particularly when the trolls are in any way subtle about it. ... I do very little to encourage them: look at the posts. ...
    (uk.people.support.depression)
  • Re: To SCT censor Stefanie.
    ... I have seen many troll posts about this, but no one ever posted any facts. ... In addition photos were published of him in the police station ... There is nothing in any Thai newspapers about any sort of police problems, only newspaper and magazine articles about his doing some good things for Thailand and for his business. ... there are absolutely NO negative references anywhere other than what know trolls posted about anything. ...
    (soc.culture.thai)