Re: Vancouver is 'best place to live'
- From: Cory Bhreckan <coryvreckan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 15:49:11 GMT
Adam Whyte-Settlar wrote:
"Cory Bhreckan" <coryvreckan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:NX09i.7785$Gy4.3301@xxxxxxxxxxxRobert Peffers. wrote:"Cory Bhreckan" <coryvreckan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:KTI8i.4184$V01.3746@xxxxxxxxxxxThat is certainly true *but* there are other reasons. The execution path in binary executables is different on *nix so you can't just slap a virus onto the end of a legitimate application and expect it to run when the legit application is called. Also, even if you could pull this off, it wouldn't run in root space (unless the user is an idiot running as root) so it wouldn't affect the OS or restart at boot time, it also couldn't affect the boot sector. Also, I have yet to see a network application: news reader, email client, web browser etc... in *nix that would actually *execute* selected posts or email attachments. In short: Yes, it is /possible/ to write a virus for *nix and yes, *nix doesn't have the user base *but* anyone with the ability to actually write a 'successfull' virus for *nix would be too busy making piles of money working for Google, Microsoft, Sun, HP or more likely, his/her own company. A lot of winders viruses are written (or modified) by 'script kiddies'. BTW, Mac OS X has a BSD Unix kernel and has the same protections.Adam Whyte-Settlar wrote:Ask yourself, "If I was a virus writer would I write a virus for the most used Operating system or for the least used one"? and the answer will tell you why Linux/ Unix and so on don't have many people bothered to write virus programs for them."Cory Bhreckan" <coryvreckan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:Egl8i.668$My4.240@xxxxxxxxxxxThere are *very* few Linux viruses. I haven't heard of any in the wild.Adam Whyte-Settlar wrote:Really?"Cory Bhreckan" <coryvreckan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:GWB7i.3608$J76.601@xxxxxxxxxxxNever having used anti-virus software, I don't.a wrote:No - just had a major computer crash. It's that time of year again."Ian Smith" <ianinhoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:pan.2007.05.29.17.56.40.156859@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxTraveling incognito are you? Are you also wearing a false mustache?On Tue, 29 May 2007 14:25:06 +0000, Cory Bhreckan wrote:He'd love it there - fit right in.
Adam Whyte-Settlar wrote:At last, you've found your niche. ;-)"The Highlander" <micheil@xxxxxxx> wrote in messagePapua New Guinea, and I didn't need to look it up. Must I do everything
news:t57m53l00u6qolbq8f8b8reh97rjmm1k00@xxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 28 May 2007 10:38:15 -0400, "Mary" <non@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Surprised me - I thought Port Moresby was in the Solomon's or somewhere
"The Highlander" <micheil@xxxxxxx> wrote in messageSurely that comes as no surprise?
Only one city in the US and one in the UK mentioned in the survey?
Mary
around there.
around here?
Had to reload windows and every other bit of software I've added in the last year including 10 months worth of virus updates - you know the story.
I didn't for the first few years and never had any problems but all of a sudden I started getting lots of them - about five in the space of a few weeks at one point. Decided to set up a firewall and anti-virus after that.
PC-illin seems OK - it looks after itself re:updates and scans etc.
--
"For the stronger we our houses do build,
The less chance we have of being killed." - William Topaz McGonagall
The problem winders has had, so far, is ineffective security protection. Gates chose this path of ease of use for the average user because he didn't understand the potential of networking properly in the early days. Back then, the internet *was* *nix, VAX and various other mainframe and mini OSs. Vista, hopefully, may solve this problem but it's pretty new and raw. A lot of US government agencies have banned it's use, probably until a few service packs and patches have fixed most of the major bugs.
I was just about to post exactly the same thing.
Of course you were.
--
"For the stronger we our houses do build,
The less chance we have of being killed." - William Topaz McGonagall
.
- References:
- Re: Vancouver is 'best place to live'
- From: Adam Whyte-Settlar
- Re: Vancouver is 'best place to live'
- From: Cory Bhreckan
- Re: Vancouver is 'best place to live'
- From: Adam Whyte-Settlar
- Re: Vancouver is 'best place to live'
- From: Cory Bhreckan
- Re: Vancouver is 'best place to live'
- From: Robert Peffers.
- Re: Vancouver is 'best place to live'
- From: Cory Bhreckan
- Re: Vancouver is 'best place to live'
- From: Adam Whyte-Settlar
- Re: Vancouver is 'best place to live'
- Prev by Date: Re: Vancouver is 'best place to live'
- Next by Date: Re: Cindy Sheehan Comes A Cropper
- Previous by thread: Re: Vancouver is 'best place to live'
- Next by thread: Re: Vancouver is 'best place to live'
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading