Re: New Power Stations


"Ian Smith" <ianinhoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

Nuclear power on the Earth's surface is just *so* last century - we live
right under the biggest nuclear explosion in the solar system - it's
called 'the solar system'.


Of course, to emulate it properly, we would have to fuse hydrogen into
helium. Fusion power is the one we want. It promises far more energy, with
much better safety and far less nasty stuff to deal with. Actually, this
is the flavour I meant for the speculative long-term future. Deep-space
exploration and colonisation are going to require highly autonomous
energy-production systems, with massive power-to-weight ratios. Fusion
power fits the bill, IMHO.
To stay on Earth, or to explore the rest? Human nature being what it
is, my money's on the latter.

I don't think we will live long enough as a species the way we are going.
But if we do then it's got to be solar wind power.


I agree with you that the means of energy
production/extraction/generation/regulation/financing are all subject to
the whims and aspirations of many in power whose self-interests don't
coincide with the greater good of mankind or the planet as a whole.

I also agree that it would be a very good thing to develop more
renewable energy sources, and become more efficient at using our watts;
even if only because cheap oil is on its way out, and the holy grail of
fusion is some years away yet.

The holy grail of fusion has *always* been 'some years away yet'. Well - it
has been since I was a kid at least.
That's how they get the money for decade after decade of fruitless research.


.. Of course
some of these people wanted computers and Ferraris and plasma TV screens
the same as anywhere else, but by no stretch of the imagination can they
be said to 'need' them in order to have a happy life.

A W-S

Yes, without any source of fuel, there would surely be a significant
reduction in global population, with accompanying problems, such as global
war, famine, disease etc.

Oh sure - like the west having cheap fuel has prevented wars and famine and
disease for the last 100 years eh?
Gimme a break - are you one of those who still think we invaded Iraq to look
for WMD by any chance?
Nigeria has one of the highest per capita reserves of oil and one of the
highest incidences of famine and disease in the world too.
Kind of blows your theory out of the water somewhat.
And as for 'a significant reduction in global population' - you make that
sound like a *bad* thing.


I should qualify that any power source I cite
being "the only hope for the future" etc. is with the intention that we
don't have this drastic population reduction, nor a departure from modern
technological society, for that matter.
Hunter>farmer>engineer>...space-coloniser: I think we've progressed
quite well in a few thousand years. It would be such a waste of human
ingenuity to go back.

Space colonisation is an impossible dream. Get real.
We might make it to Mars or even some of the outer planets one day but that
is hardly 'space colonisation' that's the equivalent of popping down the
road to the chippy.
The next Solar system would take us thousands of years to reach even if it
was possible to travel at the speed of light - which it isn't. It certainly
isn't going to happen with primitve nuclear powered engines that's for sure.
Maybe if we figure out time travel but nuclear will have nothing to do with
that either.
I'm all for 'progress' - passionately so in fact - but nuclear power isn't
progress it's a dirty, dinosaur industry and it's time we moved on.

A W-S



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: New Power Stations
    ... called 'the solar system'. ... Fusion power is the one we want. ... but so will some kind of advanced nuclear. ... The next Solar system would take us thousands of years to reach even if it ...
    (soc.culture.scottish)
  • Re: NASA Rushing To Mars As Per Bushs Policy
    ... >Large solar cells and beamed power. ... >nowhere near as bad as nuclear hypists make it out to be. ... Solar power arrays will work fine for exploring the inner solar system ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Solar powered lasers in space
    ... In point of fact you could get rid of New York ... When you can fly ballistically at 1 gee to any point on Earth in 20 ... have computers of fantastic power, ... LBJ hadn't cut back on nuclear propulsion systems, ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: unions
    ... They're only probationary members of the nuclear club at this point. ... don't get the full prestige of being a nuclear power. ... Iran also contemplates an end to "any material support to Palestinian ... North Korea did what it did because of the Bush Administration's ...
    (rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated)
  • Re: This months popular science - hydrogen powered hyper jet
    ... fuel and petro-based ag-chems vs. ethanol yield. ... However the nuclear plant has an economic lifespan of less than 40 years. ... Nuclear power plants are not vulnerable to ... Nuclear power plants in a "war" situation are very attractive targets. ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)
Loading