Re: Should we invade


"Val Adams" <va_adams@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1JI1g.12741$4L1.5056@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
George wrote:
"Val Adams" <va_adams@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%mH1g.12734$4L1.9304@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

George wrote:


"Val Adams" <va_adams@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:yPG1g.12726$4L1.3942@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


George wrote:



"Josiah Jenkins" <josiah-jenkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:mspd42lnio3ccv2vsv7m18cda5aqvosg4n@xxxxxxxxxx



On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 22:22:20 GMT, I read these words from "George"
<george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> :




"Val Adams" <va_adams@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:S7y1g.12607$4L1.5999@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



George wrote:



"Val Adams" <va_adams@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:a%w1g.12587$4L1.11131@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




George wrote:





"S Viemeister" <firstname.lastname@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:444624AB.227F6768@xxxxxxxxxxxx





The Highlander wrote:





It's not as though there's anything in New Zealand that we
need or
would miss. I have family there and it doesn't bother me if
they
vanish in a mushroon cloud as I loathe them anyway!


I have family there, too - and I _like_ them!
Find some other place to demonstrate on.


How about British Columbia? Highlander's 'home away from
home'.

George

Nope. I have friends there, and I like them.


Perhaps we could make a really small one that only takes out his
house.
Then he'd have to live on the streets of Vancouver and search
furiously
for those street grates with the salmon markings for use as his
private
privy.

George

No, no, no, he's one of them. Or have you forgotten 9/11? I
havent.

One of "them"? To what "them" are you referring? Are you
suggesting that
Highlander is Al-Qaeda?

No, I suspect Val is referring to the fact that he's a resident of
the
country which allowed commercial airliners belonging to carriers

from many countries (including the USA) to land safely in their


airports when the US administration had denied them landing rights
and would have allowed them to run out of fuel and ditch in the sea.

-- jjj


Well, gee, since no one knew for certain how many planes nor which
ones were carrying hijackers ready to die for Allah, it isn't a
wonder that planes were diverted elsewhere and not allowed into our
airspace at the time. And while I am certainly grateful to Canada
for allowing those planes to land. Highlander certainly had nothing
to do with it. As such, and considering his animosity towards
Americans, I see no reason why he should receive special treatement.
Wow, he's a Canadian. Big deal! He's still a jerk.

George

Well, George, so are you, judging by your behavior in here. So are
ninety per cent of the Republicans in this country, judging by their
behavior as the party in power. But it doesnt keep me from talking
with you, or being good friends with several of them. And I can
imagine very few things more irrelevant to me than your opinion as to
who I should or should not bestow my affection on, for any reason I
choose, or no reason at all.

Val de Lerkan Merkan


But since I am not a Republican, and never have been, your point it
moot.

George

Your comprehension isnt too hot either, eh? I carefully separated your
species of jerkitis from that of the Republicans, you having already
posted a position statement earlier in the week. And your opinion as to
who I should or should not like is still irrelevant, regardless of
party affiliation or lack of it.


You equated my behavior with that of the Republicans, and where I come
from, those are practially fighting words. I never stated one way or
the other who you should or shouldn't like. You're a big girl (at
least, that is the impression I get). I should think you can figure
that out for yourself. If you want to suck up to a loser like
Highlander, then by all means, go for it. He's all yours. As to my
position, well, I guess you'll have to refresh my old memory on that
one, since I have no idea what you are talking about.

George
Sigh. I said,"...so are you, judging by your behavior in here. So are
ninety per cent of the Republicans in this country, judging by their
behavior as the party in power."
Notice how you and the Republicans are each denigrated separately?

No, I read that as equating one with the other. There is no separate but
equal in politics.

I said that in partial reply to your earlier statement "...considering
his animosity towards Americans, I see no reason why he should receive
special treatement. Wow, he's a Canadian. Big deal! He's still a jerk.
"

Yes? And? Is there something I posted there that is inaccurate?

The special treatment under consideration at that time being the fact
that I choose to overlook some of his little idiosyncrasies; when I am
not at his throat over them; in favor of others which happen to weigh
more with me.

And you calling that 'sucking up', how is that NOT expressing a critique
of my choice, and a negative evaluation therof?

I rarely sit on fences, and certainly not for the convenience of a
discussion. Sorry. That's just the way I am.

The position statement was the one where you expressed that you were
Democrat, and less than fond of our current admin. Ditto.

That is true.

George


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Why no election shit? Is my new newsreader broke?
    ... The Democrats won and a good portion of the new ones are conservative Democrats. ... The core conservative element of the party is disgusted with a bunch of fools who cut taxes and raise spending delivering pork in ever increasing amounts. ... Quit beating up on the Democrats, it's partly the reason why the Republicans lost. ...
    (rec.outdoors.rv-travel)
  • Re: OT-Calif nears abyss
    ... "sucks less" may have been a point some Republicans found ... Was that a great reason? ... because one party doesn't like something, ...
    (rec.outdoors.rv-travel)
  • Re: Colin Powell Tells It Like It Is
    ... Bushes made him what he is today, and he showed his appreciation by betraying them and "his party" at every turn. ... First he let Cheney, Rove, Libby and others twist in the wind even though he knew it was his own Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitege who leaked Valerie Plame's name; and then when the Republicans nominated the most moderate, bi-partisan candidate imaginable -- one of his life-long friends supposedly -- Powell endorsed the most liberal Democrat presidential candidate in history. ... The fact that that didn't happen is a big reason why a lot of Republicans voted for Obama. ...
    (rec.bicycles.tech)
  • Re: "Sharpley Higher Prices"
    ... I only like the Democrats because the Republicans are ... I claim no party, unless anti Republican is a party. ... Reason, logic, knowledge, are deadly tools in the hands of the impatient. ...
    (sci.energy)
  • Re: "Sharpley Higher Prices"
    ... I only like the Democrats because the Republicans are ... I claim no party, unless anti Republican is a party. ... Reason, logic, knowledge, are deadly tools in the hands of the impatient. ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)
Loading