Re: Elemenrtary, My Dear Watson?
"Robert Peffers" <peffers50@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:drr6ep$8c9$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Madra Dubh" <ccaine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:j5LDf.577846$zb5.93864@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "MacP" <micheil@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:43dedbf3.12684000@xxxxxxx
>>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:14:10 +0000, Josiah Jenkins
>>> <josiah-jenkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 14:21:12 -0700, I read these words from
>>>>ElaineFromDrake@xxxxxxxxx (Elaine Goldberg) :
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>MacP wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>I just knew you were unaware of the
>>>>>> details of lap-dancing...
>>>>>
>>>>>I, perhaps, did not make myself clear. The costume in question (that
>>>>>we
>>>>>have a pattern for) is definitely an article of masculine attire. Or
>>>>>lack, thereof.
>>>>
>>>>I seem to recall a discussion (several years ago) about
>>>>W***** W******.
>>>>
>>>>-- jjj
>>>>>
>>>>>Elaine
>>>>
>>> That's what I'm afraid of - women are fascinated by W***** W******s.
>>
>> "Willey Wonker"?
>>
>>
> Well my W***** only needs one kind of W***** but I think I might draw a
> veil over that --- --- --- Ahem!
You wear trews then.
It could well have been that those amang ye what wear kilts would have
needed such appurtenances come the cold winds of winter.
.
