Re: 'Nature' approves accuracy Wikipedia as a science source
- From: "Lesley Robertson" <l.a.robertson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 20:36:14 +0100
"RadgeGadge" <jcmullennospam1000@xxxxxxxxxxx> schreef in bericht
news:40gfj1F1alfkuU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "Lesley Robertson" <l.a.robertson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:7qGdna77DeWMmj7enZ2dnUVZ8qednZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "RadgeGadge" <jcmullennospam1000@xxxxxxxxxxx> schreef in bericht
>> news:40gdvaF16sdc1U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> "Lesley Robertson" <l.a.robertson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:d9bdb$43a2829d$82a1f636$22985@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>> After reading the article, I went to Wiki, and found a huge error on
>>>> the first thing I looked at.
>>>
>>> Did you correct it?
>>>
>>> It would have taken about the same time as the post you made here about
>>> it!
>>>
>> In a discussion about the accuracy, or otherise, of the thing, you object
>> to me mentioning an error? Curious....
>
> When did I do that?!
>
> I asked you a simple question. I'll ask it again.
>
> Did you correct the error you say you found in the (unspecified) article
> on Wikipedia?
>
Of course.
Lesley Robertson
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 'Nature' approves accuracy Wikipedia as a science source
- From: Patrick MacPhuck
- Re: 'Nature' approves accuracy Wikipedia as a science source
- References:
- 'Nature' approves accuracy Wikipedia as a science source
- From: RadgeGadge
- Re: 'Nature' approves accuracy Wikipedia as a science source
- From: Lesley Robertson
- Re: 'Nature' approves accuracy Wikipedia as a science source
- From: RadgeGadge
- Re: 'Nature' approves accuracy Wikipedia as a science source
- From: Lesley Robertson
- Re: 'Nature' approves accuracy Wikipedia as a science source
- From: RadgeGadge
- 'Nature' approves accuracy Wikipedia as a science source
- Prev by Date: Re: BBC we dont believe you anymore.........
- Next by Date: Re: BBC we dont believe you anymore.........
- Previous by thread: Re: 'Nature' approves accuracy Wikipedia as a science source
- Next by thread: Re: 'Nature' approves accuracy Wikipedia as a science source
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading