interesting article regarding the seige of leningrad 2

http://www.times.spb.ru/story/15365

New Book: Hitler Didn't Want to Take Leningrad

By Manuela Muhm

Special to St. Petersburg Times

Hitler did not want to capture besieged Leningrad during World War II,
but intended to starve its citizens to death, a new book by a German
historian says.

St. Petersburg was known as Leningrad during the war.

Released in Germany this summer, the book "Das Belagerte Leningrad" by
JÚrg Ganzenmßller challenges the Soviet view of the Siege of Leningrad that
the city was not taken because of heroic resistance by citizens and the Red
Army. That view still dominates in Russia today.

Ganzenmßller set out to provide an unbiased and balanced picture of
the genocide committed against the people of Leningrad, saying that German
silence over the horrors committed in its name and Soviet propaganda have
distorted the reality about the siege.

On Sept. 8, 1941, Leningrad seemed about to fall. German troops
captured Schlßsselburg and closed their ring around Leningrad.

The city was cut off from all land access. German armies had advanced
toward Leningrad from the south while their Finnish allies approached from
the north. In the east and west Lake Ladoga and the Gulf of Finland formed
natural obstacles.

Yet, at that point Hitler issued the command to stop short. What
followed was one of the cruelest chapters in the history of the World War
II: German troops laid siege to Leningrad, at that time with 3.2 million
inhabitants the second-largest city of the Soviet Union. Almost 900 days,
from Sept. 8 1941 to Jan. 27, 1944, Leningrad was in the grip of Nazi
Germany. Hundreds of thousands of citizens - some say 1 million people -
fell victim to starvation, disease exposure and enemy action.

Why did Hitler hold the German troops back to take Leningrad? Why did
Hitler turn down the military and political triumph of conquering the city
of the October revolution?

Ganzenmßller looked into these and other questions.

As early as in April 1941, two months before Germany invaded the
Soviet Union, the Third Reich's Food Ministry reported that "the problem of
supplying Leningrad with an appropriate amount of food cannot be solved,
should it fall into our hands."

Two months later, Hitler's propaganda chief Joseph Goebbels wrote in
his war diary: "It is impossible to say what will happen to these people in
the near future. I am anticipating a catastrophe the dimensions of which are
entirely unpredictable".

Ganzenmßller makes the case that Hitler and his generals were not
interested in capturing Leningrad. The Nazi policy of expansion was directed
toward capturing territory, but made no considerations about the people
living there.

The Nazis' Generalplan Ost of 1942 envisaged the massive relocation
and extermination of peoples west of the Urals and the Germanization of
these territories with "Aryan" settlers. It was assumed that Leningrad, or
Ingermanland as it was then be called, would be the residence for 200,000
German settlers in 1942. It made no mention of the fate of the 3 million
Leningraders.

However, Hitler's invasion of Soviet Russia did not go according to
plan. In the fall of 1941, Operation Barbarossa - the code name for Nazi
German's invasion of Russia - had stalled and the food supply for the German
troops was getting short as winter approached. For Nazi Germany, Leningrad's
civilian population presented a concrete problem that needed to be solved.

On Sept. 29, 1941, Hitler announced his solution: "Requests from the
city to surrender will be rejected because the problem of the remaining
presence and nourishment of the population cannot and should not be solved
by us. We have no interest in caring for even part of the population in this
struggle for existence." He later added that "a capitulation of Leningrad or
later Moscow is not to be accepted, even if offered by the opposite side.
.... No German soldier should enter these cities."


ARMY WAS MORE IMPORTANT

Stalin was determined to hold the city at all costs. Though he first
had inwardly written off the city, he regained hope after the Soviet front
stabilized. Leningrad had too great a strategic significance to be
sacrificed easily.

"[Stalin] regarded the situation as disastrous," leading Soviet
military strategist Georgy Zhukov said after a meeting with the dictator in
September 1941. "He said that Leningrad would obviously fall within the next
days. If Leningrad fell, however, the Germans would unite with the Finns and
there would emerge a highly dangerous arrangement, creating a menace even to
Moscow."

Zhukov, who would in 1945 deliver the deathblow to the Nazi beast in
its lair in Berlin, was dispatched to galvanize Leningrad's demoralized
defenders. The Red Army made several unsuccessful counterattacks.

The Soviet leadership assumed that the German troops would attempt to
storm Leningrad as soon as possible. Therefore, when the ring closed around
the city, the Soviets continued evacuating industrial plants and factories.

The priorities during the evacuation reflected clearly the maxim of
Soviet valuation: machinery and raw materials were more important than human
beings.

In order to avert the impending humanitarian catastrophe, the Soviets
changed their strategy.

On Jan. 17, 1942, the decision was made to start evacuating large
numbers of people quickly. This meant that skilled workers and their
families were taken out of the besieged city first; refugees and wounded
soldiers were the last to be evacuated.

Contrary to the heroic descriptions of Soviet propaganda, the
evacuation went off in a highly chaotic and disorganized way.

As the Soviet leadership had failed to work out a strategy for
evacuating the population of Leningrad, improvisations led to fatal mistakes
that Soviet historians were eager to cover up after the war.

The first children moved out of Leningrad were sent in the wrong
direction, toward the advancing German troops.

Ganzenmßller estimates that between 1.3 million and 1.75 million
people were evacuated during the siege. Those remaining in the besieged city
had to endure the nightmare conditions of a daily fight against famine and
death.


Trapped in Leningrad

After the German troops had closed their ring around Leningrad, the
only access to the city was across the Lake Ladoga, later dubbed the Road of
Life. Yet in the early stages of the siege the Red Army had neither
sufficient transport capacities nor logistic know-how to supply enough food
to the starving inhabitants of Leningrad. What is more, the winter of
1941-42 was the harshest in decades. People were dying in appalling numbers.

"Whenever we walked somewhere we just stepped over corpses on our way
and by this time we were numb to this," Ganzenmßller quotes Nina Volodina,
who was 10 years old in 1941, as saying.

The distribution of food rations was based on the same system as in
the Soviet urban centers in the 1930s. In other words, workers got higher
portions than white-collar staff and workers of significant factories more
than workers of less significant ones. In addition, workers had access to
canteens and special shops and often received additional food cards.

The food rations provided by the city were barely enough for survival,
especially for people not employed at a local factory. Thus, individual
strategies for survival were developed, often with fatal consequences. "They
boiled leather belts, made soup from joiner's glue or scratched glue from
wallpapers ... . Pancakes made of mustard seeds were so extremely hot that
they ate away your bowels," Ganzenmßller writes.

People also used semi-illegal and illegal methods to obtain something
edible. During the first war winter, 818 people were arrested for theft, 586
of whom were soldiers. Some factories registered "dead souls" to get more
food. At the Stalin Factories, for example, 729 workers were registered -
but 124 of these were dead, another 107 had been evacuated from Leningrad,
70 served in the army and 21 were in police custody.

The loss or theft of the daily bread ration was a tragedy because the
city council would not make good the losses.

"At 6 a.m. we were all running for bread. I arrived at the bakery and
what should I see? - a fight. ... . They were kicking a boy who had snatched
away someone's bread. And I started kicking him, too - 'how could you?' we
had not had bread for three days! And guess what, I do not know how but I
got hold of his bread, I put it into my mouth and - it is beyond
comprehension - I kept kicking him," one boy recalled.

Unbearable hunger drove some people to eat cats, dogs and even human
beings. During the 900-day siege, 1,500 people were convicted of
cannibalism - a fact often covered up by Soviet propaganda.

The then 16-year-old Yura Ryabinkin remembered the days of the great
famine in Leningrad in his diary. "I ate a cat, stole food out of Anfisa
Nikolayevna's pots, stole every spare bread crumb from Mom and Irina - I
cheated both of them - cursed and fought at the entrances to shops to get in
and buy 100 grams of butter."


EVERYTHING FOR THE FRONT

After the war, Soviet propaganda never tired of depicting the heroic
defensive battle of the besieged city in the brightest colors. According to
Soviet historiography, the people of Leningrad did everything possible to
support the front and arms production never ceased. Yet the reality diverged
to a great extent from the myth created by the Soviet leadership.

In the winter of 1941/42, there was no electricity and the
productivity of the city fell almost to zero. "We wanted to work but there
was no electricity. Our boss said: 'Sit down and wait.' At first, we sat
there for several hours [each day], but the electricity was not on ... . We
went more and more rarely to work; we were working only intermittently,"
Ganzenmßller quotes one worker as saying.

Due to the constant shortage of food many people were too weak to show
up at their work places. "Nobody was running, everyone was walking slowly
and could barely lift their legs. Someone with a healthy and young body can
hardly imagine such debility," a young man wrote in his diary.

Another diary entry by a worker at the Izhora factories said:
"21.1.42. We are sitting here and are starving. 22.1.42. the same ... .
1.2.42. I have recovered some strength and started working though I am only
able to walk slowly and with a stick."

As men had to serve in the army and skilled workers had been
evacuated, factories soon faced a labor shortage. Most workers were
adolescents and women. The lack of qualified and trained workers led to
great losses and the army's needs were barely fulfilled.


Lifting the siege

After the disastrous winter of 1941/42 Hitler and his supporters
planned to draw the ring tighter around the besieged city, which would have
killed many more civilians. But they failed and the Red Army forced the
German troops more and more onto the defensive.

Finally, in January 1943, the Red Army forced open a small corridor at
Schluesselburg. From then on, the inhabitants could be supplied with food
and everyday goods. Soon, food rations were raised to above survival level
and life in the city normalized.

The siege would drag on for another year until on Jan. 27, 1944, when
Leningrad celebrated the lifting with artillery salutes.

Ganzenmßller writes that while in Germany the 900-day siege remained a
chapter hardly ever opened by historians and politicians, the Soviet Union
transformed the siege into a glorified myth of heroism and patriotism.

While survivors remember the siege as a time of famine, plight and
struggle for survival, the Soviet leadership depicted it as a heroic epic.
Under Brezhnev, the siege was promoted as a cult and monumental memorials to
the heroes of the siege were erected all over the country.

In post-communist Russia, little has changed. In historical
interpretations the Soviet version of a Red Army forcing the German troops
to a halt in front of the city and their heroic defense battles prevail.

These interpretations, however, are blind to the fact that Hitler and
his generals were not eager to capture Leningrad but intended to starve the
city.

A glorified myth on the one side and an ignored chapter on the other
side: in neither version is the 900-day Siege of Leningrad depicted as what
it actually was: a cruel genocide against hundreds of thousands of people,
Ganzenmßller concludes.




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: interesting article regarding the seige of leningrad 2
    ... What's with the Leningrad posts? ... > the genocide committed against the people of Leningrad, saying that German ... > silence over the horrors committed in its name and Soviet propaganda have ... > The city was cut off from all land access. ...
    (soc.culture.russian)
  • Re: Haruhi 11 (13)
    ... Shostakovich was living in Leningrad at the outbreak of war with Germany in 1941. ... He insisted on staying in the city for much of the siege and worked on the symphony there, before being evacuated to Kuibyschev where he completed the work in December 1941. ... The Leningrad, having previously been performed in Kuibyschev and Moscow, had its first performance in its eponymous city on 9 August 1942 while German soldiers still laid siege to the city. ... The orchestra at this performance included the remnants of the Leningrad Radio Orchestra - many of its members killed on the front line - and any other instrumentalists that could be gathered in the besieged city. ...
    (rec.arts.anime.misc)
  • The Leningrad Affair
    ... The Leningrad Affair ... party hierarchy after Stalin himself. ... also brought to Moscow as a secretary of the Party Central Committee. ... Soviet economy and deputy chairman of the Council of Ministers. ...
    (soc.culture.russian)
  • Re: Soviet Riga
    ... depressing songs can generate a joyful mood, ... Moscow take Soviet Estonia as "little Soviet West" - but we compared ... those from xxxxgorsk/grad/ovo further east regarded Leningrad as ...
    (soc.culture.baltics)
  • Re: And the beat goes on...
    ... >>> of which were killed by the Soviet government during communist rule. ... Leningrad with names ending in -ski (possible Polish spies), ... Then they aren't Russians. ...
    (soc.culture.baltics)