Re: For nostalgias' sake, from my scr & scrm archives (000)


"D.K." <no.email@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:deqjno$2ar$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article <qUbPe.51765$rp.38443@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> urjlew@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>Just to change the pace of what is being posted here now,
>>I've decided to repost some articles from the early days
>>of scr & scrm articles.
>>I will use the above general Subject, incrementing the
>>sequence numbers on the end, till I get tired of the
>>exercise.
>
> It means you have never seen scr at its peak. Right
> up to ~ 1995, it was a decent group with a useful info and
> a relatively low level troll quotinent. Then it gradually started
> to get out of control leading to the idea of creating scrm,
> which, like most moderated groups, promptly failed.
> Leading, it turn, to a vacuum we have now in scr.
>
> DK
>

then, sometime around the year 2000-200, a new, more dominant breed of
poster arrived at this forum. after picking the bones of the musky old
corpses that had previously resided in SCR, this new breed proceeded to
unleash a dominance so utter, so pervasive, that even today SCR reverberates
with the power!


.

Relevant Pages